So Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli is suing the EPA over gas mileage standards and the agency's right to regulate greenhouse gases.

And now he's demanding a decade's worth of documents from a University of Virginia climate researcher, Michael Mann, to see whether any of Mann's research might have violated the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act. Cuccinelli's latest quixotic quest puts science at the mercy of politicians' whims.
"The potential for harm is vast in terms of the chilling effect the investigation could have on Virginia scientists whose work is funded by state grants," writes Roanoke Times columnist Dan Casey. "God forbid that one of them reach a scientific conclusion that Cuccinelli could find objectionable."
Whatever the voters of Virginia thought they were doing when the elected Ken Cuccinelli, the new attorney general came in on a mission to roll back civil rights, handcuff the federal government and empower the voices that tell us the work of thousands of scientists over many decades is a load of bunk. That's what he's in office to do.
Just look at his choice for a messenger.
When you call Cuccinelli's office for a comment or information about his latest trip to Medieval Land, you talk to his spokesperson, Brian Gottstein -- as in Casey's column on the climate scientist investigation: "Brian Gottstein, a spokesman for Cuccinelli, confirmed the investigation but said he could not comment on it."
In this case, Mann was a key part of creating the hockey-stick graph of world temperatures. And look who was blogging that very story on the tenther website Tertium Quids before he became Cuccinelli's spokesperson. "There has been no global warming since 1995," Gottstein reports a "Climategate scammer scientist" as admitting. See also "The myth of global warming - Part 1" and "Part 2" and "More global warming lies exposed."
The attack on the science of climate change is not a hidden agenda on the part of Cuccinelli's office. The campaign against reason and government was right out there in the open, before he put his team together. Gottstein, writing in February on why people call for attention to climate change:
They realize they can accomplish this using the guise of global warming to sway people and governments to be sympathetic to regulations that will drive industries out of business, make private automobiles extinct, and get citizens to give up their incomes and freedoms to support government programs to "save the earth."
And Gottstein again, in January:
My question is, why are no world leaders -- including our president -- calling into question the whole global warming hysteria? Why are they ignoring all of this damning evidence that is emerging that shows global warming is a hoax? Why are teachers still teaching global warming fiction to our children? Why are states, including Virginia, still talking about stopping global warming through new regulations? Why is the American economy-killing cap and trade legislation still on the table in Congress?
How long will this apocalyptic charade go on?
That's his question. For most of us, the bigger question now is how long rational thinking can go forward unimpeded in Cuccinelli's Virginia. The fox has gotten the keys to the henhouse.





So far as I can tell, the only fraud against VA taxpayers is being committed by Cuccinelli!
so scary
I'm embarrased to live in Virginia. Sorry rest of the US. While I did not vote for him, I wish I could unvote him now!
Can we recall his election? I think we have grounds to prove he is mentally unstable.
Hey - you're not alone. Arizona, Florida, Texas, Oklahoma, and a host of other states that have elected Right-Wingers are also a national embarrassment.
I do think it's time to bring at least part of this charade to an end by pointing out that the most reactionary states are, not coincidentally, Red states that are at the bottom of education and literacy standards for the country.
They have largely semi-literate populations that have no concept of how our government is designed to function, they don't know the difference between a representative democratic Republic, which is what we have, and Socialism, or Marxism, or Communism - terms that they throw around interchangeably and with obvious lack of understanding what any of it means.
They have the highest illegitimacy, and adultery rates in the country while claiming to act at the behest of their Bronze Age Old testament Diety.
They take the most from the Federal Treasury and give the least, all while claiming to want their independence from any Federal oversight.
And they cling to the racist concept that only whites should rule, and are the superior members of our society.
We can leave them in the dust as we progress, or we can try and drag them up, kicking and screaming, to where we are. But we absolutely should not let them make ANY decisions about how this country should proceed.
Their ignorance and superstition is poisoning our country.
beg 2 differ ral - the US is a corporate republic masquerading as a democracy.
This model isn't really true for Virginia. We went for Obama, we currently have two Democratic senators, and we're not poor or uneducated. What we are is apathetic. We have short memories. We had two good democratic governors in a row, but it makes Virginians twitchy to have only one party in power. Plus the Dems ran a crappy campaign with a lackluster candidate. I would argue that apathy is what is poisoning our country and letting the minority wack-a-doos take power.
Repubs like to spout off about the "tyranny" of Obama, and the overreach of the federal government. Well, Cucinelli's latest move is very reminiscent of tactics used by totalitarian governments throughout history. You don't have to look too deeply in the history books to see how the Nazis and the communist governments in Russia, China and North Korea acted in much the same manner, not only having state-sanctioned science, but also state-sanctioned books, films, music, architecture....virtually every facet of life was defined by what the leadership, (usually one supreme leader) felt was tasteful, entertaining, or was simply something that didn't criticize their regime. Cucinelli is now acting in much the same manner. He doesn't like gays, so he works to have state protections stripped from them. He is in favor of big business, so he goes after laws against gas mileage standards that he sees as threatening those businesses, and he apparently doesn't believe in climate change, so he will go after anyone who does believe, or does research that goes against his beliefs. Please come after me, Mr. Cucinelli. I lived in your state for 7 years, and in that time, I supported all the things you so vociferously oppose. I am glad to be out of the Commonwealth of Virginia now, as if I were still there, I would be doing all in my power to see that you are removed from office for your outlandish, and most likely, illegal behavior.
And those leaders fell. Our best weapon against people like this is the use of Free Speech to point out their stupidity, self-contradictory positions and most of all, use humor. The current group looking to power-grab has a lack of humor in common with dictators and dictatorships. Let's make fun and have some fun, while never forgetting that "It Could Happen Here".
But Robert, why did those leaders fall? Because they set up governments that were inherently unstable. In every one of those totalitarian regimes, there was always internal turmoil, often instigated by the leader in order to keep any of his possible enemies as weak as possible. Whenever there was a hint that someone was getting a bit too powerful or popular, he was eliminated. In contrast, what have we seen during the Bush administration? Unwavering loyalty, even in the face of obvious incompetence or even criminal behavior, as was evidenced in things such as the outing of Valerie Plame, the vote fraud of 2000 and 2004, and illegal wiretapping. They could act with impunity because they knew that their corporate masters could protect them. Their eventual loss in 2008 wasn't a repudiation of their behavior, at least not in the eyes of the corporations...rather, it was a signal that they had to go to even greater extremes. As it was, their work over the past 3 decades had set up a situation where even their failures became great successes for them, as the bank bailout proved so aptly. You can mock and point out the stupidity and contradictions of their viewpoints and policies, but in the end, they have proven to be expert manipulators, and have been able to convince a vocal minority of Americans to unwittingly support their views. You could mock a T Rex for its ridiculous looking front legs, but it would still eat you as effectively as any other predator.
I was having a similar thought, specifically about the Nazis. After they came to power one of the things they did was to 'reform' (more like 'deform') all levels of education and the sciences to reflect their ideology. Things like history and biology were obviously things the Nazis wanted to twist for their own ends, but even seemingly non-ideological things like mathematics and physics were affected. Now, the GOP and the NSDAP are two different institutions and the latter is dead and gone. Republicans are not Nazis. However, today's GOP is drifting ever closer to the extreme right edge of the political spectrum. In terms of where they are, the GOP is more in the range of British National Party and other far-right (but not neo-Nazi--although that's being generous in the case of the BNP at least) parties in Europe.
Of course, the point about the Soviets is well taken, but the GOP is still a far-right phenomenon.
Things like this make me a little happier that I moved from my home state of Virginia to New Jersey many years ago.
The Cooch, daily reminding us why he should be considered one of the most dangerous men in America. Maybe I'm blinded by my liberal progressive bias or the Government conspiracy to kill industry just for the hell of it, but really, when an official spews nonsense of this caliber, shouldn't it be grounds for some kind of disciplinary action, if not outright dismissal? It's 2010, for God's sake. Do we really need this kind of backward-looking medieval nonsense in our politics? I feel for the residents of Virginia.
The right wing is in its death-throws and men like the Cuc are standing on the bow of a sinking ship.
We see he and his ilk for what they are - losers fueled by envy and self-loathing.
What people fail to realize is that the far right of today is a corporate creation. Are there angry, disaffected people out there who are anti-government? Of course there are...always have been, always will be. But have they ever been such a seemingly dominant force in American politics? No, and there is a reason why. People on our side of the aisle were very angry during the Bush years, (heck, even during the Reagan regime), but we didn't come armed to meetings with congressmen or even the President. We didn't elect officials who went to extremes that didn't reflect what the majority of voters wanted. Why? Because corporate America not only didn't see our viewpoints as useful...it found them downright antithetical to their goals. However, they now see things such as healthcare reform, financial reform and climate legislation as a threat to their power and their bottom line, so it's time to gin up as much opposition as possible. They do that by astroturfing, funding and building up groups that are ostensibly just regular citizens with a beef, making it appear that there is tremendous opposition to this path, when in fact, the numbers of people who strongly oppose these things are very small. Cucinelli is just another tool of corporate America, and people need to wake up to that fact. The right wing is most certainly not in its death throes, as it is the political arm of the corporations, and as such, will not only NOT disappear, but will grow even stronger now that the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling allows them to basically buy politicians on the open market, rather than skulking around in the shadows with their campaign donations.
Well said and salient. Thank you for intelligent input.
Fascism, "the merger of corporate and state power, combined with a belligerent and jingoistic nationalism."
Reagan started us on the path to Fascism, Bush/Cheney took us almost all the rest of the way there. Now that Obama is trying to do a relatively mild course correction away from that, the Plutocrats who smelled total victory during Bush/Cheney are enraged to see the possibility of having victory snatched away at the last minute and they are determined to stop Obama - at all costs.
I'm sure there are CEOs in this country whose fondest dream would be a riled up white supremacist getting close enough to rid them of their "problem".
whoa ral - didnt u get the jonah goldberg memo wherein fascism is leftwing? ck out blogsforvictory.com then rpt to a FEMA reeducation camp. ps - i replied to an earlier comment of urs before i read this one in which we agree.
oh yea - interesting that eisenhower warned about the "military-industrial complex" yet his own party (gop) is deaf.
Eisenhower's republican party is nothing like the beast that exists today. In fact, today's repubs would probably call Eisenhower some kind of communist, lefty or traitor. As has been pointed out by many recently, even Reagan couldn't pass the purity test of today's repub party. They are also not the republican party of Lincoln. No, it truly is a manifestation of fascism, as so deftly defined by ral above. As such, it isn't a "party" any more than the Communist Party is a party. They don't represent a group of like-minded individuals who come together to formulate policies and solutions to problems, and then try to convince others to join in the discussion. Instead, their agenda is set by corporate America, and they then do their best to manipulate people just long enough to win an election. When that doesn't work, as in 2000 and 2004, they know they have other options, whether it is a Supreme Court crafted by their predecessors, or electronic voting machine companies that can throw the vote for them.
A cornered beast is at its most dangerous, y'all...
Bam! Right on the money!! Obama warned us too, he said during the campaign that power never relinquishes willingly - he knew what this would be like.
I agree with my namesake, Carol (without the 'e') - for the first time since moving here in 1978, I'm truly embarrassed to be a VA resident. Even tho I was not responsible for voting these neanderthals into office, they do represent my state to the rest of the country, and perhaps the world, in the most unflattering of lights. If these knuckle-draggers are emblematic of the direction my state is going, it'll be going there without me.
The man is an idiot and a dangerous one at that. I am still amazed that he doesn't have more important work to do in the AG's office. If all he has to do is invent issues and problems then he is definatly costing VA too much money.
Why doesn't he do something PRACTICAL, like suing the EPA to allow lead back in gasoline? Back when I was a kid we all breathed lead; those affected grew up to be closed-minded right-wingers (whoops! never mind...)
Why demand documents on climate change? It's not like this Cuc(koo) and his nest of idiots are capable of interpreting and understanding them. For such incompetents, Mammon will always trump Reason.
While I agree that Cuccinelli is a whack job right wing extremist who doesn't understand science. I think we should all recognize that the man-made global warming theory is not new and is based less on science than on reason. The Club of Rome said the theory would be used against mankind, not to save the earth.
And when Al Gore went before Congress and was asked if Ken Lay of Enron had been in contact with him with regards to legislation for a climate change bill, as had been reported, he said "I don't know." And even Goldman Sachs has been tied to the climate change/cap-and-trade bill.
If we are true to our values as liberals, shouldn't we make an effort to address the real issues about the quality of life for us and for animals and nature? Isn't corporate pollution the biggest problem? Aren't auto manufacturers responsible for designing cars that are more environmentally friendly? Would current legislation address these issues? Or will this legislation just pass the buck to consumers?
In order to understand where Gottstein is coming from, you need to remember how difficult it must be for tiny minds to see the big picture. I still don't feel like cutting him (or Cuccinelli) any slack. George Allen was bad enough, but these clowns take the cake.
They, and the voters who elected McDonnel and Cucinnelli have made Virginia a laughing stock. I had hoped that by going blue in '08, we'd reached a turning point. All we did was propel the conservative (and I'm being kind in calling them that) base into bull-blown Reactionary Mode.
i can almost see a boob in the background.
Stupidity reigns again. This is actually sadder than 'The Jersey Shore' being a question on Jeopardy
Why complain here? Let Cucinelli know yourself @http://www.cuccinelli.com/action_ctr.htm
this service is brought to you by The Society for Letting Idiots Know how Stupid They Really Are (SLIKSTRA)
Electing McDonnel and Cucinnelli will shed light on their reactionary proposals, and that's a good thing!
This is not a direct comment on the story but a comment on the comments. It is so refreshing to read intelligent, well articulated responses to important issues. Rachel's show sets the tone for us and to her credit, we've taken the cue from her. Even some of my favorite progressive blogs sometimes have responders who get carried away and rude. Rachel, thank you for reminding us how to be civil and intelligent in our discourse.
"For most of us, the bigger question now is how long rational thinking can go forward unimpeded in Cuccinelli's Virginia."
Say what, now? Looks like rational thinking is definitely being impeded in Cuc's VA.
How sad that one of the most intelligent and rational thinkers in US history, Thomas Jefferson, came from a state that is now contending for the title of "State With the Most Ignorant Dunderheads".
Topics academics may now study at UVA: Why God Supports Liability Caps for Oil Companies; Open-Toed Sandals and the Decline of Morals; The Word "Shucks": Should Women Be Allowed To Say It? #Cuccidemics
At one point can one legitimately ask if this guy is unstable?
I think we're way past that point.
Do voters in VA have the right to recall an elected official? This guy is trying to be the Sarah Palin of VA
I wish...
Just so you guys know, the "hockey stick graph" has been largely debunked be even the Royal Academy of Sciences.
Do your own research, there will always be liars out there.
It does seem as if this guy is a big crazy though.
Even if climate change is some how prov-en wrong...better safe then sorry...Who let all the wing nuts loose?