The news environment tonight required some last minute course correction on the show we had planned. Ultimately there was not enough time in our hour for all of the segments we'd prepared. While it's not uncommon for us to leave some stories on the cutting room floor, because this was Melissa Harris-Perry's last show before Rachel comes back from vacation, and because we felt strongly about this particular segment, Melissa taped it after the show was off the air, to be added to the playlist and podcast and here on the blog.
Here is Melissa Harris-Perry on the role of faith in politics.





eek gad that was a painful episode. Faith is really bad, except when it is good (and I'm humble enough to tell you which is which!).
I appreciate that Maddow never really addresses these issues. It is a mine field and should be avoided.
Do not believe in dogma in stone and dust
From men who lived and loved in ancient lands.
Do not believe what others claim you must,
For thus you leave your future in their hands.
Do not believe in gurus or the Church,
For their beliefs are based on guilt and greed.
The mirror of your mind, you alone must search,
For you alone can shape the life you lead.
Observe, deduce and ponder what is True,
For Truth consists of that which we conceive.
Awareness comes from what is True for you,
And we can each achieve what we believe.
If your Truth can advance the paths of Man,
Then follow it and live the best you can.
I agree 100%. I don't need anyone standing in front of me telling me how to love God or live my life. God knows me better than I do,,, whats in my heart. I trust myself to live and walk my on Path.
i've head that before - who wrote that?
Me...
Way back in 1994...
I have posted online before, on the Able Minds Forum
I'm NoBody sprcial...
heh....
That is an excellent poem. I would like very much to be able to quote it with proper attribution.
It's a great poem but it's message misses Prof. Harris-Perry's point. She said faith is an act of intellectual humility. I think we can agree that politicians could use a big dose of that. The point is we don't always know all the answers no matter how much soul-searching mirror in mind gazing we do. Sometimes results in no way match data. I'm sure 160 years ago many predicted there'd be no such thing as a sizable African American community let alone the multitude of contributions made by said group to American society and culture. However, here we are in some of us are thriving others hanging on but we're here nonetheless, 40 million strong.
But it's not. This is no slight against MHP, but she was wrong. It's not Intellectual Humility. Agnosticism comes closer to that, though if anything I'd say that Agnosticism would be Intellectual Objectivity as it just acknowledges that the supernatural is beyond our ability to analyze by definition.
Faith is more like an Intellectual shrug of the shoulders. I appreciate where she was coming from, telling a story about personal faith and it's role in politics. Especially regarding our history.
But,....it's a little creepy.
Let me explain. There is a huge amount of gray area along the lines of what constitutes culture and what constitutes religion. You see this most pronounced with Arabs/Palestinians/Middle-Easterners and Islam and Jews and Judaism, but there's also recently been a build-up of it with regards to Blacks, and it's creepy.
The basic idea is the same throughout, that you could be born into a religion, and that to be true to your cultural identity you also have to be a follower/believer.
Another side effect is the cheap practice of insisting that any attacks against a system of belief is an act of Racism, as the term Islamophobia is being misused in Europe.
Don't get me wrong, I'll fight for your freedom to practice your religion, but when I'm critical of the religion it's not a personal attack against you, and it's not an act of racism, you are not your religion.
When I've seen this pressure in the Black community it has always, always used the Civil Rights Era and the Emancipation of Blacks from Slavery as examples, and that's just ridiculous. "The Good Lord" didn't free us, a great big bloody Civil War did. And MLK Jr. was inspired by Gandhi, what might that mean for spirituality. And Malcolm X was killed by members of the Nation of Islam for god's sake!
It's not just wrong to think that we have to honor our ancestors by believing what they did. It's creepy. Especially when many of the Blacks received their knowledge about God from very people they were suffering under. Especially when many white people justified slavery through the use of the pro-slavery verses in the bible, and dusted off the old "We're leading the savages to the lord" excuse they used with the Native Americans.
Manifest Destiny anyone?
So, I understand how some people could come to see faith as some sort of cultural inheritance, a shield that we once used in times of oppression that we pass down from father to son.
But that doesn't make it less creepy.
Absurdism is an atheist philosophy defined basically as the human need to understand the universe while the nature of the universe is beyond human comprehension. The vastness of the universe is humbling, and it's also humbling to believe that there isn't anything out there that cares about the affairs of human beings.
Not all atheists believe the nature of the universe can be broken down into a mathematical equation. But it doesn't mean we should stop trying to understand it.
It's when people think they've got it all figured out that they become arrogant...which could be with or without faith.
So very well said.
Here's an interesting thought from John Gribben on the nature of the universe:
Are We Living in a Designer Universe?
The creators of the world were closer to men than to gods, argues John Gribbin.
telegraph.co.uk/science/space/7972538/Are-we-living-in-a-designer-universe html
Anyone ever read Lord of Light by Roger Zelazny? Just saying. Great book.
Agree, DonQ. One of Zelazny's best. And he's written a few.
Randy,
Permission is happily given.
I've posted my sonnets online before, without expectation of attribution or compensation. I'm flattered that you like them enough to ask.
I view them like little literary messages in a bottle. If anyone likes them, great! If they want to pass them on, even better! If they change anyone's life for the better..
The profit for me is the good karma they vreate for me. I believe the karma collects in my account, whether I'm informed about it or not...
The karma in our lives we each create
In everything we think and do and say.
The balance in our souls of Love and Hate
Determines how our future lives will play.
The tests we each decide on before birth
Are challenges that through our lives we face.
The way we face each challenge proves our worth.
Within us each resides the path to grace.
Refrain from judgment, blame or expectation,
Accepting each without conditions set.
Forgive yourself and others without hesitation.
Release yourself from further karmic debt.
When you give mercy, grace and love as free,
These will return and grace your lives to be.
David, have you been published? If not, you should be. I think you are terrific.
Thank you so much for sharing with us your wisdom and talent. I look forward to more lovely thoughts and words from you.
Eleventh line. Hurm.
Otherwise, pretty good.
Joybar,
See post 1.14. Nope, never published, but if you're interested, I've put most of the ones I've written on the Newsvine. You are welcome to enjoy them...
Peanut,
"Forgive yourself and others without hesitation." Hmm...
Do you have trouble forgiving yourself for something you've done in the past? Well, that would be IN the past, and what is done, is done. Beating up on yourself about it would just generate guilt, a negative emotion, and that's bad karma. You woukd be programming yourself to fail...
Do you blame others? It's not what others do that affects you; It's how you FEEL about what others do, that affects you. Anger, resentment, frustration are normal reactions to actions of others, but all of these are self-destructive negative emotions, and bad karma. Sure, you can try to force others to do what you think is right, but imposing your will on others not only takes away their chance to make their choices and possibly gain giood karma, it's little more than karmic slavery, and that's VERY bad karma. Try gentle persuasion instead; It's not only better for you, but you have a better chance of actually changing their minds to your way of thinking...
Kind of like this...
Now we ALL know why it landed on the cutting room floor! That was awful!!
Only a moron would believe that anyone can separate themselves from their religious faith whether in politics or anywhere else. Additionally, even the Aheists cannot separate themselves from the hatred they have for Christianity.
This video was stupid. She appears to be arguing against faith and then for faith. Who ever scrapped this one....GOOD CALL!!
Really harsh, Katy264, and really unfair. I've read through many of your previous posts, and you seem to greatly dislike this blog site and many of the people who reside here. That's your right, of course, but one would think that if it's so beneath you, you'd want to avoid us.
She never argues against faith. At all. She does equate reason with cynicism as if reason can't imagine something better. It's really disengenous of her not to talk about gawd that's clearly her argument. What a load of crap.
I don't really think there's a problem with that. While I don't hate all of Christianity, (the Jesus bits aren't bad, and Christmas is fantastic,) I do admit that I hate several parts of it. But I don't hate Christians.
I suppose it's the Atheist variant of the Christian idea of "Love the sinner, hate the sin." I don't hate people just because I think their religion isn't true.
MHP did a good job. I hope she's on tap for the next time Rachel needs a substitute.
I don't hate Christianity, it's Christianism I have a problem with.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1191826,00.html
Katey, it is clear from this post and others that you have posted that you do not understand the situation that was presented ...An athiest or agnostic does not hate religion of any kind ... but views religion as a pasifier for those that do not or will not think for themselves ... 2000 years ago the latin philosopher Seneca wrote: "Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful
Just remember that when in doubt or in trouble a politican will invoke "god"
Kathy264 - I am not sure how you make the leap that if you are an Atheist you HATE Christianity. Do you not understand what an Atheist is? And I agree with the other people who have reacted to your post. Although, I would say that it was a little more than harsh.. it was ignorant and even childish. And even more important added nothing to the discussion. Now that, your comments, are something worth hitting the cutting room floor.
I'm adding my two cents here because I think it needs to be driven home that atheists don't hate Christians. If you want to insult a group of people, at least get your facts straight--maybe do some research. (Although, being a person of faith, I imagine doing research and gathering facts isn't something you're used to doing.) What I do hate is misogyny, oppression, hypocrisy, ignorance, discrimination, and lazy thinking, but I don't hate Christians just because they're Christians. I wonder if it's common for Christians to have this misconception about atheists because it's what they need to tell themselves so they can feel righteous in hating yet another community of people who don't think what they think or believe what they believe. How is it that atheists manage to display a greater sense of compassion than most believers seem to do? It's a shame.
I can honestly say that I've never met an atheist that HATES Christians but, many atheists find that the "Christian attitude" is a bit extreme and very judgmental. Also when you bring Christianity into politics, you get these Conservatives actually pushing their religious views on the rest of the world. While I, myself am not an atheist I refuse to align myself with an organized religion for two reasons. One, is because I'd rather have my own religious views than have some person stand before me and tell me what to believe in and, two organized religion is one of the most detrimental things to human beings there is. I offer my view, of course because this faith in these organized religions has led to many uncalled for violent acts such as the crusades, the Salem witch trails, the holocaust, in a way 9/11, this post-9/11 hatred, and most recently these bombings in Aslo. While faith itself gives us hope and gets us through the hard times, these organized religions twist and warp this hope into intolerance and hatred for those who don't see their way.
Peace.
It LIVES!!!
I belive in God with all my heart! But I do not go to church for a reason, just one guy- you are right, Bright1 you you are also right. organized religion cause more harm than good. I have gone to many derffernt churchs trying to find one I could call home. The minster almost always has to finsh a sermon wit some kind of slam against other christin faths and all faths that are not christin. I DO NOT BELIVE THAT GOD LOVES ONE PERSON OR GROUP OR RELIGION OVER ANOTHER!!! OUR FOUNDING FATHERS DID THE THINGS THEY DID FOR A REASON, THEY LIVED UNDER RELIGIOUS TERNNY< THEY SEEN FRIST HAND WHAT HAPPENS WHEN ONE CHURCH TAKES CONTROL OF THE GOV> AND COUNTRY! WE WERE FOUNDED ON FREEDOM NOT CHRISTANTY!!
Katy, you are ignorant about atheists.
I once was a charismatic Christian but lost my faith and found I didn't need it. But atheists don't hate god or those that believe...we just don't get there to start!
If I were still a person of faith, I would pray for you because you clearly have hate in your heart. But instead I know you get the world you want. One full of darkness, ignorance and hate. Peace be unto you...because you are going to need it, hon.
Katy, you fall into a trap seen very frequently here: use of absolute words.
A minor change would have made all the difference. Instead of:
"Additionally, even the Atheists cannot separate themselves from the hatred they have for Christianity."
...you should have said:
"Additionally, many Atheists cannot separate themselves from the hatred they have for Christianity."
Your version could never stand up to scrutiny, the alternate could. I am an atheist, and I do not hate Christianity. I think it, like all organized religions, is silly and used to control masses of people, but despite the many things within it that are worthy of hatred, it's not a binary all-or-nothing.
And like I said, this kind of usage is very common here. How many times do you see things like "all conservatives eat puppies" and "all liberals care more and will spend every bit of everyone else's money to prove it" in political discourse? Religion is hardly different.
Not all cons are awful. Not all libs are awful. Not all atheists are awful. Not all xians are awful.
If there is one rule every commenter here should follow, it's: read before you post and be sure you can back up your words.
Oh, Katy264, you really stepped in it! Here's how it breaks down:
A = Without
Theism = God
Atheism = without god
We don't hate god. We don't acknowledge god. There is no god. You made it up. We also don't acknowledge satan. We are not devil-worshippers. Satan is a christian construct. So are heaven and hell. If I don't buy god, I don't get to buy the other stuff either.
Got it? Atheism means I don't believe in god, not that I hate god.
Do you understand the concept better now?
Regarding the faith segment that was rightfully cut from last night's program, it's the same argument other religious people have given me before: "What gives you hope?" As if I need a fairytale to reassure me.
The sun on my daughter's face gives me hope. The kitten frisking around my feet gives me hope. There are all kinds of things that give me hope that don't depend on magical thinking. I don't need something outside of myself to tell me everything will be okay. Either it will, or it won't.
If you subscribe to magical thinking, consider this: God sees every sparrow fall.
But does god do anything to stop it? NO. The sparrow falls. How hopeful is that?
All that says to me is that god is indifferent to mortal concerns.
And Vox Populous: Christmas is awesome, but it was the christians co-opting the pagans. Christ was born when the lambs were gamboling in the field, which means March, or later. Jerusalem is on the same meridian as Los Angeles, and the weather is remarkably similar. The pagans were happily celebrating the shortest day of the year and refused to give it up. So the christians said, fine, you keep your holiday, and we'll crap it up with our dogma. Now join us! And the weaker-minded of them did.
"The christian resolution to find the world ugly and bad has made the world ugly and bad." -Nietzsche
To be quite honest, the most hateful behavior I have seen and experienced comes from people who label themselves as Christians. They have often proved to be vicious, gossipy, vengeful, judgmental, discriminatory, and absolutist in their thinking.
I should also interject and say that I have occasionally encountered Christians who I believe come closer to being Christian (ie, as much like Christ as a human can be). They strive to love others and not to judge but to understand. A few of these individuals have offered prayers for me even if it is clear they do not agree with me on substantive social issues.
Unfortunately, I find that the first version of "Christian" is more common than the second. Katy, you also made a judgement about atheists that sounds wholly unlike the many I know. These tend not to be haters-- they tend to be people who understand the world not through a religious text but rather through their own perception of what they think will make the world a better place-- usually one along the lines of secular humanism rather than competitive ideology that you suggest.
Grow up. If you are so insecure in your own faith that you have to attack others (or their lack of it), you apparently need to do a little more spiritual work.
Normally I do not respond to hateful, vile comments, but you personally insulted me.
To stay in your tone, only morons would let faith guide them on political or other issues, besides faith. It is true our morals are influenced by our upbringing, which in most cases is in a christian environment, be it schools or home. But for the non morons, who is most people on this site, we DO know how to keep faith where it belongs, and be guided by rationale and science. An example, to spell it out for you, we might not ever have an abortion, for whatever reason, that does not keep us from making it available to others.
As many people before me said, Atheists do NOT hate any religion.
How can you say I hate christianity? You don't know me. I do consider myself an agnostic, leaning towards atheism. That does not stop me from respecting other people for what they are, be they Christians, Muslim or whatever. Their faith is their concern, not mine.
While we are at the subject of hate, more people have died in the name of God, any denomination, than any other issue. Does that mean, that religious people in general are more hateful? No Atheist ever called their legions to arms. No atheist ever started a war in the name of atheism. think about that.
So you call this video stupid because she does not agree with your believes?
MHP was talking about the faith you execise when you pray in your closet. Not the kind you get rewarded for shouting it on a street corner. Not the kind that political "Christians" want to shove down the throats of all and sundry, but the kind that is your own business, your own relationship with God, and no-one elses.
Otherwise everything that is said to be done in the name of God is fair including the terrorism of Breivik, Jim Jones, David Koresh; the bombing of Planned Parenthood, abortion clinics, and mosques in America; not to mention the picketing of funerals, the outcry against gay marriage, and the horrific acts of every psychopath who ever was directed by a voice in his head that he was just sure was that of God.
Citations, please, of calling people who disagree with her nazis.
You could be a Neo-nazi. White supremist...I'm pretty damn sure you are.
She was talking about the faith that allowed the slaves to become free. To over-turn Jim Crow, to have lynching out-lawed.
As opposed to the faith touted by Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum. The dog-whistles and scapegoats utilized by every conservative politician who want to hide behind the cross as well as the flag.
mountebank, citations, please of DonQ's hatred of everyone, including black people and asians. And do you mean to demean DonQ by referring to him as "her" and "she"? Are you a mysoginist?
Citations, please, of DonQ's hatred of everyone, including black people and asians. The burden of proof is on you.
You have made the assertion. The burden of proof is on you.
Maybe I'm late on this exchange, but Montebank seems to have been first in saying that "Donkey" (is that DonQuixokie?) is a "rage-filled stooge who hates everyone, including black people and asians." I scrolled back farther but didn't find direct commentary about black people or asians, so I have to say I think that you probably need a citation. You provided one above, but that quote has nothing to do with blacks or Asians, so I'd like to see something more specifically on point.
Plus, Don is a common title for men (and seems a play on Don Quixote, from excellent Spanish literature by Cervantes).
Children, children, children.... play nicely, please...
I consider myself an agnostic, but not because I don't believe in God. I just believe that nobody has an exclusive claim to the Truth.
I’ve never understood how God could expect His creatures to pick the one true religion by faith—it strikes me as a sloppy way to run a universe.
-Jubal Harshaw, Stranger in a Strange Land
History does not record anywhere a religion that has any rational basis. Religion is a crutch for people not strong enough to stand up to the unknown without help.
-Lazarus Long, Time Enough for Love
It is a truism that almost any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so, and will follow it by suppressing opposition, subverting all education to seize early the minds of the young, and by killing, locking up, or driving underground all heretics.
-Lazarus Long, Time Enough for Love
The most preposterous notion that H. sapiens has ever dreamed up is that the Lord God of Creation, Shaper and Ruler of all the Universes, wants the saccharine adoration of His creatures, can be swayed by their prayers, and becomes petulant if He does not receive this flattery. Yet this absurd fantasy, without a shred of evidence to bolster it, pays all the expenses of the oldest, largest, and least productive industry in all history.
-Lazarus Long, Time Enough for Love
(All quotes above courtesy of Robert A. Heinlein)
Also, it might be help to distinguish between PREJUDICE and simply TO JUDGE. Many of us may precede to pre-judge (PREJUDICE) individuals based on notions of ignorance or religious views, extreme or non-extreme, etc. BUT I and many other individuals, am/are making the distinction evident that I myself/we are JUDGING Christians, and as mentioned before, Christianists-- that is on their radical behavior through condoning of the imposition of ideology and, further, direct participation. To suggest that Christianity has no history of racial, sexist, SES, or religious imposition or discrimination is to assert infallibility. Do we wish to go back to the 16th Century where in fact these views were culturally and socially acceptable in public and private domains? Additionally, we should ask whether these Tea Party fanatics are merely more than the breeders of PREJUDICE, stemming from psychological & ideological foreclosure? Many of us have reached a psychological moratorium where in which we have discovered FAITH in what it should be-- JUDGING not based on reason, but instilling the notion of intellectual and ideological humility -- making conclusions based on FACT, where sometimes even this is not possible.
I have been posting here for years. My views are well known and I gladly name myself a Hateful Bastard.
You on the otherhand, are exactly what you call yourself:
You have no business in the company of your betters.
mountebank is derailing.
Regulars know who is who. Don, bagel and hoosier are all different people. Don is definitely a he. I know this because we've had rather lengthy conversations on this board. There is a community here, people who have gotten to know each other.
Don and I have disagreed on religion, and he's never called me a nazi nor have I ever felt hated.
Notice no denial on being called a white supremist. I said he could well be one of J.T. Ready's militia ballet dance group. His thesis is that Asians were done poorly by MHP because she didn't slather public adoration on them when she told of blacks and hispanics have 1/20th the wealth of whites [thread: Can't Have Property if You Are Property.] Whereas, he said, single parenthood was to blame for the poverty of blacks and, implicitly, moral inferiority.
I called him on it, he defended Asians, did not say one word about how I said he characterized blacks - ergo, I called it right. I asked him if he was from Storm Front or J.T. Ready's Neo-nazi crew. His panties are righteously twisted because I mentioned Nazi, thereby invoking Godwin's Law...but not one word has he said about NOT being a white supremist. As posted earlier, Japan were close allies of Germany before World War 2, therefore Asians would never have counted as Mud People. Mountebank is a wanna be anarchist as well as racist. I'm sure J.T. Ready would love him. The pieces all fit, but now Mr. Anger is Energy is a victim. Comments? Questions? Full post transcipts can be found in the thread: Can't Have Property if You Are Property, as well as this one.
For an Anonymous Internet Poster of Indeterminate Gender, Don sure has gotten under your skin. It's almost amusing.
Almost.
:: clicks "Ignore This Author" ::
Don Quixokie
You won't shame me. I stand by what I say even when I'm wrong. In this case, I don't think I am. And let me disabuse you of some notions. I'm 40. My parents were hippies. My great grandfather was Mexican. Both my present and my ex-wife are black, I have an aunt who is a filipina. I went to a Magnet Middle School where I was one of three white kids in my entire grade. I tested in the 97th percentile nationally and several of the black kids in my class tested about as high and nearly all had better grades. I've been to college though I have no degree, broke the grading curve in an American History class taught by a professor who had a Ph.D in Economics. I've also been to prison where the rumor on the yard was that I was in for 2nd * Murder and I decided there may be worse things than being misunderstood.
I stayed in prison longer than I had to for the opportunity to go to college on my dime, but was kicked out of both when my financial aid fell through.
Now, who the hell are you?
Project much? What I was hearing from you was that it was moral inferiority that was root of the hardship faced by black families. I pointed it out to you, but instead of correcting that assumption, you doubled down on defending Asians...which had not a single goddamn thing to do with what she was talking about.
My positions on race and social justice are matters of LONG record here. I don't know what audience you think you are playing for, but I doubt you are impressing the old timers here in any way you'd be proud of. Stop while you are ahead.
Amen to that. I am far from impressed and much more progressive than this young blogger could ever hope to be!
Don Q. may be many things I'm unaware of (aren't we all kind of like that, really?). However, having read most all of his posts over the past year of so, I'm quite certain he's neither a Nazi, nor a hater of Blacks and Asians. Just my two cents....
That's Neo-Nazi. And if that's the worst you've ever been called then you really don't get out much do you? Being called a White Supremacist doen't hurt nearly as bad does it? You never rebutted that blacks and hispanics are morally inferior and too damn late if you do now. Saying that I have no sympathy for single black parents still assumes that it is moral inferiority that is the cause of their unwedded state. As should be clear by I know, I KNOW how complicated the history is and all the forces at work to destroy the black family now. Saying "well Asians do so much better and THEY are minorities - why can't blacks be more like Asians." That is beyond weak. That is precisely the false equivalence a white supremacist or Neo-Nazi would use. And just so we are clear, a Neo-Nazi is just another flavor of white supremacist. You all suck equally.
They probably decided—and quite correctly, it looks—that for other than TRMS loyal viewers, one would have to have a Master's degree to understand the segment. Or actual faith.
Carolinalady! Where's your fan??
mountebank
"Back to you. Citations, please that you and Donkey are not nazis or misogynists and that you are not jerks for slanderously accusing me of same and that believers and non-believers can "come together".
------------------------------
Just trying to "keep up".
Someone is not familiar with the Newsvine Code of Honor.
Moderator! Code of Honor Violation.
Who said I was angry? I know where most of the people I've interacted with stand and I love them for it, and most of them tolerate me well enough.
You hoisted yourself on your own petard, I just held it for you. Hey, anger is energy right? You tryin' to jump start your car or something?
Word to the wise. We don't need rebels. What we need are adults. And what we don't need are people saying "well Asians do so much better and THEY are minorities - why can't blacks be more like Asians?"
Umm, Tyler, this one's for you.
When someone calls me a Nazi, I mostly just think they are being childish and lack a strong argument. Mountebank is having a full blown temper tantrum and really needs a time out.
It's an overused analogy, and thus not very effective. That's all. What you have done, Montebank, is you have derailed a thread because you were personally offended. It's really quite juvenile. As is voting up your own posts.
Didn't Godwin's Law end this fight dozens of posts ago?
and No, don't try and draw me into responding,
You know me, I'll only post jokes.
Oh, but Montebank, I was called a Nazi by you. But you know, I'm rubber, you're glue. Whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you.
mountebank
"You could be a Neo-nazi. White supremist...I'm pretty damn sure you are."
See above blinkered fascist.
Are you illiterate, or just a stupid Nazi?
I am publically calling keep in time a NAZI, as Donkey Dork did me.
How does it feel, Nazi?
----------------------------
It doesn't ruffle me in the slightest, Mountebank, because I know nothing could be further from the truth. And my purpose of posting really wasn't to antagonize you further, though that would have been - in fact, was - ridiculously easy to do. No, I just thought a little clarification was called for at that particular time. Have to admit, though, that hasn't been at all easy with this particular thread.
Speaking of clarification, perhaps I should point out that as a Black citizen of these United States, I've seen and heard the absolute worst that you can imagine, directed at me, over the years. And yes, everyone here can see you're not the only one to possess an impressive arsenal of slanderous, hurtful adjectives and names to hurl at your perceived enemies. Whether you believe it or not, I don't feel that I am one of them.
"Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us."
"He who exalts himself shall be humbled and he who humbles himself shall be exalted."
"If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles."
"But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you, bless them that curse you, and pray for them which despitefully use you."
Yes, I can certainly see how that would and did hurt you, mountebank. GrrlRomeo's advice above seems valid and right to the point, though. We're all human here, and granted, it just ain't easy. Nothing really worth having in this world ever seems to be. Peace, however, is worth the effort, and I wish nothing less for us all.
There are plenty of fascists and racists hiding behind American flags. My grandfather fought in world war 2 as well. For that I'm very proud of him. But he was also a racist son of a bitch and because of which I cut him out of my life from the time I married my first wife until he was on his death bed.
Impugn your patriotism? The Tea Party douche bags who are destroying our nation all claim to be patriots. They celebrated 2nd Amendment Day on the 15th anniversary of the murrah Federal Build bombing. Speaking of which...
You a veteran? Put your life on the line for the nation the way your father did? So did Timothy McVeigh. When he was arrested he was wearing a shirt that said:
I even tried to find common ground by bringing up Kerouac, he just referred to me as "New Jack" and said that he wanted to shiv me in the yard.
What the hell are you smoking? Lead paint chips? I don't go in much for metaphor or hyperbole. But if you do, don't expect to be taken seriously. And don't expect to be taken seriously by me. Physically threatening me personally? Are you trying to be funny? And apologize to you?
I repeat what I said earlier. I hope you get eaten. If your father was in World War 2 then you should be old enough to know better unless either he had you REAL late in life or you are too simple to help yourself. In which case...my condolences. I'll send you a fruit basket.
Probably. But the person who said this (mountebank) can't show any kind of forgiveness, grace or mercy. And that's what's wrong. People know what would be better, what would make a better world, but they cannot seem to bring themselves to do it. They can tell others what's right, but cannot themselves do what it takes. That's the problem with ego, eh?
Be the change you want to see.
Don's at it again! But, par for the course!
Just a bitter unemployed ex-con, who can't climb his way out of a hole (but was the smartest kid in school and in his cell block). Has all the answers but everyone no one in his real life cares to listen. Uses name calling to get some response to his posts, since most of it is just hate-spewing, race baiting, or delusional rants.
Just proof of what too much paint sniffing gets you!
Like I said, it's not Christianity I have a problem with. It's people who declare themselves Christian and don't even understand what Jesus taught.
What I have a problem with is Atheists who quote scriptures. The don't believe in God but want to quote the bible!!!
What is a religion if you don't practice it? Nothing. Pointless.
If you actually believed in God and believed in the Bible, then you must believe God will judge you for what you say. Samaritans were scorned, and yet Jesus said the Samaritan is your neighbor.
Atheists are also your neighbor.
mountebank is banned for a day however, I see Katy is back with the same hate filled spew she always has and always gets away with here.
Two words more than you needed Bexa.
Katy264, please mind rule # 1 of the Code of Honor.
That's really disturbing...she gets away with it again!!!
Montebank, you're not supposed to create multiple accounts. Especially for circumventing a suspension.
MODERATOR!!!
Permanent ban for this one...lol what a ______________. Fill it in.
Newsvine is a privately owned entity. And privately owned entities can create their own rules of conduct in striving towards a particular goal. And Newsvine's goal is an atmosphere of civil discussion.
I love that this POS quoted Katy, they belong together...
Neither of them adhere to the CoH...one is obvious...the other...like a snake in the grass that skirts the edge.
This is a re reg of a re reg...I'd bet...and will go on and on after being banned.
MountebankSuperstar banned. Multiple of mountebank, also banned.
Don't register another account while on suspension.
That will be back *looks at watch*
Sudden Flamewar Combo-Breaker.
Random Trivia Interlude
Honey is the only food that does not spoil. Honey found in the tombs of Egyptian pharaohs has been tasted by archaeologists and found edible.
The king of hearts is the only king without a moustache on a standard playing card.
The hummingbird is the only bird that can fly backwards.
This one actually should seek psychiatric help.
Something is rotten in Maddowblog. I smell a re re reg.
MODERATOR!
About Fighting Fascism
Contact This Author
Ignore This Author
Add to Friends
Add to Watchlist
Articles Posted: 0
Links Seeded: 0
Member Since: 8/2011Last Seen: 8/01/2011
Fighting Fascism has not filled out a bio yet
Sally
He registered on another account.
Sterling behavior from someone who's FATHER fought on D-Day. Katy, you really know how to pick your friends.
Thanks Vox! Here's a riddle for you:
"As I sit on my ass, on the ass of my ass, the following paradox strikes me: Half of my ass is in front of my ass, while the whole of my ass is behind me!"
What am I doing?
Riding a donkey.
Yay!
I know, it wasn't hard, but I got to say ass a lot!
Riding a Donkey facing backwards...which just has to be a political metaphor for something ;)
A farmer's donkey dies. He's is using a post-holer to get the donkey's grave started. While he is about this, his minister walks by.
"Making a post hole for a fence are you?"
The farmer says "rightly speaking, I don't think that's what they would have called it in the bible."
DON'T give the correct answer. You will just get in trouble.
Okay, can I just laugh really hard instead?
Don't hurt yourself!
Fighting Fascism banned. Mountebank Re-reg.
Mountebank-Mountebank Superstar-Fighting Fascism just broke the land/speed record for getting banned. I salute you sir, never a finer performance of sheer douchebaggery have I ever seen!
Scepticism is closer to what I'd call intellectual humility, that's ACTUALLY admitting that we do not know everything. There's nothing humble about faith, in fact, I find it rather arrogant.
I wouldn't say that was ALWAYS true. Making such a claim is almost as arrogant.
I believe in a Divine Power. I also believe that every one of us has a spark of that Divine Power within; the problems arise when one of us hears that spark and mistakes it for the Voice of God. In ancient days, that man was considered a prophet; nowadays, he'd be labeled a schizophrenic...
I don't think schizophrenic is quite the proper word, since premonitions come from psychic experiences. There is something going on with these psychic experiences and people who have these are too aware of the limits and circumstances that arise. Which leads to this revelations in the bible, people keep trying to interpret these scriptures and saying what will happen. Well I can say with great accuracy they will be wrong, since if someone is going to do such evil in this world would they do it exactly the way someone said it to be, NOT.
if we all have the divine power from within and can hear from that divine power, isn't it the voice of divine?
alpha and omega...positive and negative....summer and winter...day and night...all encompass divine...which is god..
Actually, Carrie-Anne it is, just as over 50 some people tried to stop 911 from happening. But some were told that we would not be able to stop it, because the powers to be are corrupt, power craving, arrogant, hypocrites, greedy, and deceivers. And that was when Bush, Chenney, the Republicans, and certain rich people took control and even 10 years later, we are seeing the worsening corruption they have been doing. Actually, the divine power than is very correct, because some people experienced it through the light. So as far as justice for those victims of 911, well the numbers of the victims keeps going up and we will be lucky we ever get true justice about it all. Also, here is another question, if God didn't care about homosexuals and condemns homosexuals, then why would God have homosexuals that are out there that tried to stop 911.
divine is through the light as well as through the dark.
Thanks. I needed that :)
Hogfather, by Terry Pratchett.
However, I agree that skepticism is true intellectual humility. The key is knowing when to be a skeptic and when to belief. As the human mind can handle more than just the two options of unreserved cynicism and blind Zealotry.
You need to be an absolute fundamentalist when it comes to believing in yourself, and in your family and friends. However, you also need to periodically challenge your beliefs and presumptions, to be sure that you're not mistaken.
Believe in the good that people can do, but be skeptical enough to remember their potential to disappoint. Believe that people have good intentions, but be skeptical enough to know that good intentions don't mean that someone's choices are good. Etc.
Remember that religion is like dumbo's magic feather. We've done great things with it, (terrible things too, but that's another story,) it's shown us the potential we had within us as a species, but we mustn't let that fool us into believing we need it to fly.
Roger Zelazny, Lord of Light.
Vox, I'm an agnostic, yet when the chips are down and I'm terrified or anxious about the health or well-being of someone in my family - I petition St.Jude, God, Jesus, and all the benevolent Lords of the Universe for help.
I just know my words are "out there" in the Universe and that gives me some succor to tide me over during the dark days.
I also believe that when I ask for help from the Unknown, I'm actually opening up myself to myself, reaching some part of my own mind for a solution to the problem. And very frequently, an answer comes. Perhaps that is God speaking to me, or that Divine Wisdom is buried somewhere within myself that is answering.
As an agnostic, I just do not know.
agreed, joybar...
While I do not have faith in a god or higher power. I do have faith. I have faith in humanity. I believe we can fix our problems if we want to. All those grim numbers have a solution.
Slavery ended in this country when enough white Americans decided it was immoral. They started seeing slavery as immoral when they began seeing African-Americans as human beings. And they began seeing African-Americans as human beings because African-Americans changed their hearts and minds.
Public opinion on gay rights is changing because gay people are changing people's minds....in spite of what people's religion tells them.
Have faith in God all you want. I just wish people had more faith in each other.
But you could also argue that this faith in people is being used for profit by these big companies like Goldman Sachs and these banks. Adjustable rate loans are a form of people putting their faith in other people and it ending up screwing a lot of people out of homes and a lot of money
While I agree that we need faith in other people, I think we need these people to show us that they deserve our faith
Corporations aren't people. They're made up of people, but the way they're organized, no one is really accountable for what the organization does.
And anyway, I didn't say people should have blind faith.
I find that any time the word "faith" is used we get into some very messy semantics. Rational arguments can be made that the "faith" in a religious context is a very different element than the "faith" in an intangible concept like justice. Though generally speaking the word means to have belief in something with no proof. That's why we intertwine religion with other abstract ideas unnecessarily. Maybe we need a new word for faith specifically referring to the subcategory of religion. Any ideas?
Precisely, Jazz. Faith, virtue, hope, love, humility—and their polarities, with every shade in-between—are inherent in humanity and irrespective of religious tradition or institution. I would not want to separate the spirit from the body anymore than I would 'faith' from politics. Though we may not all agree that we have a spirit and soul animating the tangible physical body, I do believe most subscribe to or at least idealize a set of 'spiritual'—or shall we say, 'incorporeal'—values universal to all as the bedrock of conduct in any arena of life.
Can we not substitute 'spirit' for 'religion' as the unknown that informs our lives, which we can have 'faith' in to fuel our vision for a better world?
Even better, let's 'smart up' America and use lingo from quantum physics. The Obaminator can handle that, I'm sure. Can the GOP?
If the GOP wants to keep faith in the domain of religion, inseparable from politics, then they must also lay claim to hate and bigotry, as well. And looking at current affairs, that's not too far off the mark... Anders Breivik is yours. TAKE THAT TO HEART. ER, FAITH.
Yes GrrrlRomeo...you describe my "religion" as well. My god is humanity in it's purest form. Thank you.
 Melissa Harris-Perry did a great job in this segment about faith. I am a fan of The Rachel Maddpw Show and now I am also a fan of Melissa Harris-Perry. I hope that Melissa will one day have a show of her own-I think she would be an asset to MSNBC.
Carol Ann: Hear Hear! I completely agree. I think she would make so much better a host, in the MSNBC line up than lets say ... err ... Al Sharpton. By the way - can anyone remember the name of the other young woman who used to fill in for Rachel int he earlier days of her hosting on MSNBC. As I recall, Rachel and her used to work together on Air America but that's about all I think I do remember. So does anyone know who I am talking about?
Anna Marie Cox!
Ana Marie Cox only filled in once. Maybe you're thinking of Alison Stewart.
Alison Stewart hosted NPR's Bryant Park Project but I do not recall that she was associated with Air America. Alison guest-hosted TRMS a number of times. Ana Marie Cox did work at Air America but as Grrrl said, was not a frequent TRMS guest host. So I guess you are on your own, @Pissywoman.
It was indeed Alison Stewart, wife of Bill Wolff, exec producer of TRMS, and they have one of the cutest little boys I've ever seen.
Other hosts have been Ana Marie Cox, Bill Wolff and Howard Dean. Her most frequent guest host is Chris Hayes, Washington editor of The Nation.
As much as I would love for Melissa Harris-Perry to guest host frequently, she won't be available between mid-August and the end of May. School starts and she'll be doing her professor duties at Tulane University in New Orleans.
The one who was forced to touch Howard Stern's butt while at MTV news and former co-host of World News Now with Anderson Cooper. Who is this Bill Wolff you speak of? I'm kidding of course. I've just always liked Alison Stewart. I freely admit that I watched MTV's 1992 election coverage more than any other network. Alison Stewart and Tabitha Soren rocked it.
Although I Do like Melissa Harris-Perry, her segment "About Faith" was very disappointing.
Basically, reality makes her feel sad, so she prefers to hold a belief unsupported by evidence to deal with this -very real- world.
One doesn't have to belief in nonsense to show intellectual humility. Reality can be sad and thought, but one doesn't need faith to fight the good fight and to do what is morally and ethically necessary to improve our condition in this "real" world.
Understandable stand on her part, but very disappointing.
I am quite mysteried you missed the whole point. Melissa did not say faith in the magical, a deity if you will. She said faith in the vision of something bigger that us, our immediate circumstances, is possible. I would caution that faith is a double edge sword and can also be wielded in immoral and unethical possibilities. Keeping them all positive, toil and faith are key ingredients for our progress.
If I didn't have 'faith', I would've f*cked this very unreal world a long, long time ago. Many famous scientists, politicians, inventors, philosophers, visionaries, etc. are inspired by the unseen, more 'real' than the world before our eyes. Though they may not always admit it.
Correction. I meant to say:
Reality can be sad and tough, but one doesn't need faith to fight the good fight and to do what is morally and ethically necessary to improve our condition in this "real" world.
I like Mellisa too but that faith segment was crap. It seems she was trying too hard to please part of her constituency. Pliz Mellisa next time stick to some relevant current affairs  and stop the televangelism on some abstract faith. I really like her as a host though.
Mike, I disagree that MHP's segment re: faith and politics isn't a relevant topic. Have you been paying attention to the espousal's of Bachmann, Beck, and the like? Their faith is all over their politics.
What I heard from MHP, and what I appreciated, is an attempt to reclaim faith and the way some of us view faith in relation to all aspects of our lives. She expresses another way to view the connection between faith and politics, one that isn't so dogmatic, vitriolic, or polarizing.
She talked about faith in something bigger than ourselves being a source of hope, especially in circumstances where these's very little hope. This may not be a source of hope for everyone, but as she acknowledged, she looked into the relevance of faith after studying Black culture in the US and found faith to be a non-quantifiable reality for the Black slaves who suffered much.
To MHP, I say "Amen!" and thank you for helping to reclaim a different view of faith.
Great job to Melissa Harris-Perry! While I missed Rachael you did a wonderful job. Rachael owes you at least a drink for taking control on one of the craziest weeks in our government.
All well fine and good except I don't believe any of it
.Show me a mother who brings a child into this world and then hides from it all it's life letting everyone else tell him what it is his mother wants from him and if he just adhears to it all of his life when he dies, he will actually get to see his mother for the first time.
You have got to be kidding me.
No wonder we're gullible enough to believe rich people care for us, our government works in our best interest and Santa Clause brings toys to all the good children and tells the bad children to suffer for being bad.
We live in a very unrealistic world of hope and faith totally ignoring reality because if we were realist, we would have taken over our government and taken back our country instead of waiting for some mythical being to step in and do it for us.
Slavery lasted over 400 years because slaves were taught that someday God was gonna rescue them and they did not have to fight for themselves because if they did God would be mad at them and not let them into heaven.
Well what about the slave masters and owners, are they in heaven and if so why seeing as how they killed multitudes of slaves. Would I want to share a heaven next to the person who beat me practically every day of my life? And why would A God who supposedly created everything and loves all things sit back and watch atrocities like this and not step in.
Could you stand there and watch the neighborhood bullies continuously beat your child every day while going to school and never step in, saying it will build character in him broken bones and all.
It took me years to shake off the fear of even questioning the existence of God and when I did, too many unanswered questions arose that would not let me just ignore them and "BELIEVE", "HAVE FAITH" "TRUST GOD"! yeah right.
Melissa did not say faith in the magical, a deity if you will. She said faith in the vision of something bigger that us, our immediate circumstances, is possible. I would caution that faith is a double edge sword and can also be wielded in immoral and unethical possibilities. Keeping them all positive, toil and faith are key ingredients for our progress.
Funny, but I agree with you and MHP...
I knew it had to happen. Once that silly Christmas movie with Tim Allen came out, people would start to forget how to spell "Santa Claus". (no -e) Hint: the movie title is a pun, based on a homonym. a Claus is Santa; a Clause is a legal requirement un a contract. The Santa Clause in the movie isn't the character played by Tim Allen; it's the hidden legal clause on the ID card Scott Calvin finds that forces him to become Santa...
Actually, the name Santa Claus was itself started as a mis-spelling, of the Christian Saint Nikolas, reputedly an old man who enjoyed giving gifts to children of the town he lived in to emulate the Wise Men of the Christmas story.
Of course, nowadays, he'd be locked up as a pedophile...
... not to mention, indoctrinating children in a Socialist agenda, breaking and entering, and I'm sure there's some FAA regulations about filing flight plans and illegal fuel emissions (all that reindeer crap...)
sooo true, david!
I would just like to say, Melissa you are an awesome anchor and mesmerized me with a fresh and direct approach to the issues without the rhetoric. You explained subjects in a way that I truly listened and understood.
Being the rising star you are I look forward to catching you on more programs, and hopefully soon your own show. Thanks
Here, here! I agree. Melissa, you are to date by far the best guest host Rachel has ever had.
You mesmerize me as much as Rachel does, but in your own way with your own quite different intellectual and debate skills.
I hope you can guest host for Rachel more often, but I know you have an extremely full plate. Maybe they can set you up to host from New Orleans once in awhile???
Thanks for a great week!
I also think your segment on faith was fascinating, appropriate, and I'm sorry it was cut from the broadcast. I'm glad you recorded it for us.
I really enjoyed your perspective and thoughts. They were refreshing. Other than Al Sharpton, I believe you are the only other minister to anchor on MSNBC.
True faith, religion and morality is the force that makes people do unselfish things. To be generous, to sacrifice for others. The abolition of slavery was driven by the idea that it is wrong. Otherwise, why would a non-slave have the slightest interest in ending slavery? (OK, maybe to eliminate a no-wage competitor.)
But I see little evidence of that kind of altruism in faith-oriented politics today. I see hypocrisy. Jesus preached that we should help the least among us. No sign of that in public discourse. Instead, it's cut food stamps and whatnot. Perhaps if Jesus had to balance his family budget he'd have changed his tune -- oops, forget he never had a family, or a budget either, I suppose.
Ralph Reed (of all people) said or repeated: "When you mix religion and politics, you get politics." He was wrong in the sense that we actually get state-mandated religiosity, such as in abortion laws and the other things MHP mentioned. And that kind of government control of private life is EXACTLY why the Founders added a wall of separation between church and state.
Thank you Melissa Harris-Perry. I notice you didn't wear the RM uniform camisole & blazer, but you otherwise held to her style of informative, intelligent discourse without rancor. I can't wait to see you center-stage again.
If Christ came back today and took a good look at christianity, he would be shocked and ashamed by how his teachings have been perverted.
Still I have to wonder about the ego of anyone who encourages followers, for whatever reason.
If Christ came back, the "Christians would be climbing over eachother to knock the nails back in again and would double tap him in the head when he rises on the 3rd day for being such a filthy commie socialist and enemy of capitalism. All of which are the reasons I would stand by his side.
"With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil—that takes religion." -- Steven Weinberg
Btw, I'd include Communism and Fascism under the category of religions.
This is a very moving piece by someone I hope to hear a lot more from. What I take away from it, as a non-believer, is that there is some common space where believers and non-believers alike can come together and talk about becoming "something greater" than what we already are.
I cannot thank TRMS enough for the gift of this week with Melissa Harris Perry.
insincere
mountebank - Why are you trolling people who are participating in decent, intelligent conversation? You obviously have nothing of import to introduce, only challenges aimed at distruption.
bb - I agree, believer or non-believer can come together with a common interest and a faith that joint effort can overcome an obstacle. That is how America was built and the only way it will survive.
I thought the MHP segment was great.
I invite any investigation as to whether or not I have multiple accounts. You, sir, do not know me and do not know us as a community. But we are knowing you far better than we care to.
Hear, hear. I stand with DQ!!
Before she died of Alzheimer's, my mother would ask me to take her to church on Sundays. I was glad to do so. However, when she asked me to sing the hymns with her so she could follow along - she was very hard of hearing - I couldn't do it. To my mind, singing hymns of praise to someone I didn't believe in would be rank hypocrisy, and I just couldb't force myself to be that dishonest...
Ask the moderators. Do your own damn homework for a change.
@mountebank, I wish you'd stop this nonsense. You're skewing my data on tolerance and defensiveness, and the majority of input (especially from undetermined personal beliefs) are leaning me towards faith in humanity.
I feel I can say,"You're being a jerk." with retained objectivity.
Tell me monte, would YOU want someone in your house who is acting the way you are?
Directed to mountebank - Where are the site moderators when we really need them? I have never seen so much trolling allowed by one person on this site. It is reprehensible behavior by someone who is adult enough to be allowed at the keyboard of a computer.
*ahem*
flag that user, kelly.
mountebank, you are suspended for a day for violating rule # 1 of the Code of Honor.
One of many I would think. Strange to come out so strong in a few days after being silent since Dec of '10. My guess would be there is more than just this account.
mountebank has no respect for anyone and hopefully will be banned forever upon return.
Thanks Sally.
If you think it's bad here, Sally, you should see some of mountebank's other posts in this section. #justsayin
And Katy only gets a slap on the wrist for,
and
What message does this send us? We can sort of get away with insulting people as long as we don't say they are crappy? I think it's worse than "@!$%# you" and you get a week for that.
*disappointed....
It took me getting banned several times to work my way up to half a month. You also notice that you never see hatey around anymore. The moderators patience isn't endless. Thank God.
hate was banned forever...and he deserved it. I just don't get that this obvious troll doesn't get what she deserves.
Well if it isn't Katy the resident Pharisee who knows less about the New Testament than I do about country music, yet deems herself a spiritual authority. Trust she would be first in line to drink up whatever burnt almond Flavoraid Rick Perry wants to pass off as the blood of Jesus.
Good one Don...where's that puke bucket? I dunno how she gets away with it...but she does...we are missing something here I think.
Should Christian leaders get involved in politics?
The most striking facts about Jesus and his ministry is how little attention He gave to politics. No matter how hard people tried to make Him take a stand on the issues of their day, He always returned to teaching about the Kingdom of God, and how it is demonstrated in the world through love, healing and mercy.
During Jesus' ministry, some people in Israel believed that the Roman government should be overthrown. Known as Zealots, they were in some ways like many of today's liberals. They believed passionately in social justice, that people deserved a chance to live their lives without oppression. They expected Jesus to be a leader who would throw off a government that dealt cruelly and harshly with a conquered people. They expected Him to abolish poverty and suffering through the rule of an earthly kingdom. But Jesus did not meet their expectations. We know from the Bible that He paid taxes to Rome, and lived within the laws of the ruling government. He refused to lead an insurrection against the Romans. He actually submitted to government authority in His own death. When confronted with a choice to give money to the poor rather than allow a woman to minister to Him, He chose the woman's ministry, thereby building relationship with her and His disciples.
Likewise, like many conservatives in contemporary politics, religious groups in Israel were passionate about morality. They battled issues such as prostitution, adultery, and deviance from the laws of God. They expected Jesus to join them in denouncing such behavior. But Jesus did not meet their expectations, either. Instead of contending with people in different moral lifestyles, He actually partied with sinners. He allowed Himself to be in contact with prostitutes, drinkers, religious lawbreakers, and thieves. He developed long-lasting relationships with them. In fact, His harshest words were for those who would judge people for their sin.
So what resulted from the actions of Jesus? Changed lives. Matthew left his job as an oppressive tax collector, and followed Jesus. Mary Magdalene was set free from demonic oppression and became one of Jesus' closest followers. Zacchaeus gave back all he stole and more. A woman caught in adultery escaped death, and received freedom and forgiveness.
No political slogan or hand-held sign has ever changed someone's convictions. Protests, shouting, and political battle will only polarize people on an issue. Regardless of which side wins or loses a political struggle, people will continue to believe what they did before. If you want to change your community, your nation and your world, the most effective action you can take is to introduce people to Jesus, and to demonstrate His love and compassion to them. Through His death and resurrection, all of us can be free from the effects of sin, and enjoy unlimited and joyful relationship with God. This is where changed lives come from.
Political power and law rule only through fear of consequence, not love. Let us make our focus the same as Jesus'. People are transformed when they experience love in relationship with Him.
An absolutely fantastic commentary on Faith and Politics. I think you said it all when you mentioned humility. Knowing that one doesn't know it all. That was what I took away from my younger religious years and the one thing that should be brought up again and again when someone uses religion to build political bills to govern a country.
Those who do, suffer from the sin of presumption--Presuming to know God's mind. They are privy to their own mind but presuming to know God's is hubris at it's worse. Bad governance is to then take that presumption and put it into law. Humility and actually practicing the best of "do unto others as you would have done unto you"--in one's own life and having that as one's guide in interacting with others and all this world (creatures great and small) is the best way to practice a life of faith.
Thank you Melissa Harris Perry so much for being here to help give us all some real faith/hope for the future.
My mother always quoted the Golden Rule (Do unto others as you would have others do unto you) ever since I was old enough to understand words.
To me, that one sentence is really the only true Religion.
BTW, I didn't notice that MHP had a lisp. Am I the only one who didn't? I have always enjoyed her when Rachel had her as a guest, and she was great as this weeks Hostess.
segment started OK but faded away into blah blah "we must believe there's something else" "there's something bigger out there" statements mixed with ramblings on why a whole race should have such faith in the stone age book and crazy ideas kept within it (which was used to subjugate themselves!) as justification for faith itself and it's role in current society- mental gymnastics indeed.
Poor segment- glad we didn't waste prime time on it.
With all due respect, I got something totally different than you did from this segment. I do not recall references of the need to believe in the bible and it's crazy ideas. I got that faith = belief in the good in others. The belief = hope and hope can = a movement. This is what I got from this segment in the most simplistic terms. I respect everything that was said by Mrs. Harris-Perry and I do not believe in a god.
Melissa Harris Perry made a very personal, impassioned and thought-provoking statement about faith. She showed enormous courage in doing so. Whether I agree with her or not (as it so happens, I do), she treated me to one of the greatest moments in television I have experienced for some time. Thank you, Melissa.
Ohhhhhh, yeah :)
I hate it when Rachel goes on vacation. Melissa seems like a very nice lady, but
1. Her speech impediment (lisp) is very distracting
2. She frequently stumbles over words
3. Her delivery is very artificial and forced - watching her anchor TRMS is like watching a 60 minute valedictorian speech at a high school graduation.
4. Does *everything* need to be presented with a "black" angle?
Have you watched the first few episodes of the Ed show when it started? Anyone needing to speak from a teleprompter and script will frequently stumble in enunciation, cadence, and delivery until they get the hang of it. Even Dylan Ratigan you can tell speaks too fast for the scrolling teleprompter and must frequently pause or slow down his recitation in order to wait for the teleprompter to catch up.
As for the lisp? Who cares, get over it. If it's that much of a distraction read the transcripts - the messages are the same.
anyone with a lisp grabs my attention in wanting to go through all the lessons of speech therapy - since i did about 6 grades of it. when nervous or rushed too far, i hammer, stutter and my twisty tongue say all sorts of new words you'll never find in any dictionary, with a lisp or course.
by the way, melissa is very intelligent - i love when we can see a angle, such as a 'black' one, or a 'gay' one, because it brings people into a new angle that they would never get a chance to see.
@Grumblecakes, sometimes we have to see past imperfections to observe fully. Your focus on Professor Harris-Perry's lisp and occasional misreading of the teleprompter may have prevented you from truly appreciating her message. For that, I am truly sorry.
Her delivery is measured and imbues the medium with a calm that I like, but find to be rare on cable television. I suspect her delivery has been honed in innumerable classroom lectures at the University of Chicago and at Princeton. I would count the Tulane students lucky who will be in her fall classes this year.
Who cares about her grasp of the technical skills needed to read a telemprompter...She has the intellect and study to present a topic in a full and rich historical context - to parse something for ease of understanding to an audience. I find it amusing/insulting that you see her bringing up the slavery example as a "black" angle. What is wrong with that angle? It was a perfect example of her point on faith. We all come from different, storied backgrounds and experiences. We all tap into our own stories and experiences to communicate. Why should slavery be exempt from the dialogue due to it being a "black" issue. It was reality and part of history and Mrs. Harris-Perry knows enough of the topic to inject it into a conversation to make a more global point. To reduce it to a "black" angle is disingenuous at best and quite insulting at worst.
Its not much of surprise at all. She had studied it extensively, taught it extensively. It was problably her strongest strength so it was the basis on which she referenced everything else. No shame in that. Slavery as an instutition still deeply impacts our society especially the African American community. After the slaves were freed, they were never welcomed with open arms and instantly assimilated. The statistics and the plights of black families give lie to so many things we want to believe about America. But when it is pointed out, far too many - like monte - say "Well Asians are a minority, if Asians can do good, why can't blacks?" All it comes down to is the fact that until we do right as a nation by blacks, by immigrants, by Muslims, by the poor, the under-served, we won't do right as a nation. Nor should we. Really, what WOULD Jesus do?
You forgot Christians!
Blacks in the US are the only group that I know of that has a whole industry built around ensuring that they stay victims! Leaders of the NAACP aren't exactly hurting for cash, are they? There is a whole money machine alive and well in the US that only thrives if black people feel like victims. It is truly disgusting. Can anyone say democratic party??
Okay, not going to get all angry and do a point for point breakdown on how wrong that is. Just going to say that as far as stupidity goes that's an achievement.
If we're going to throw out crazy racial conspiracy theories out there, I could accuse the Republican party of being an industry built solely around making white anglo-saxon protestant males, the most privileged class of people on earth, feel like they are victims, like they are threatened.
Hence the right wing nuts like Glenn Beck throwing out conspiracy theories about New Black Panthers, The Homosexual Agenda and A War on Christmas.
I'll be surprised again if they let her get away with this. I do not see a connection per usual.
Right Katy. The moral inferiority of blacks. The one thing you and monte are in absolute agreement on. The thing that prompted me to ask him if he was a member of a white supremacist group or maybe J.T. Ready's Neo-Nazi dance troupe. That is why he so busy bawling about what a victim he his now.
Well Don, as it turns out Katy is not a true Christian. She stated that none of us will know if there is a God until we die....oh ye of little faith...
I called no one morally inferior, those were your words! I feel like they are being enslaved again by certain people who profit from their suffering. We just don't agree on who the real slave masters are!
do you really think the democrats want blacks to stay a victim?
democrats have voted on so many agendas trying to ensure they get every opportunity to reach their dreams - with good reason being that plenty of folks still overlook ability as soon as they see something that isn't quite white - be it name or looks.
i really think people need to look outside of their boxed in party affiliation. corporate power is doing most of that bidding in wanting that suppression - along with racist.....
racists exist within any party - but corporate power are the ones who do the most profit in keeping people as victims.
It's the rape whistle argument. The makers of rape whistles started out wanting to prevent rape, but now they don't want to decrease rape at all because if the rape rate declines they'll see a subsequent drop in whistle sales.
Wait, no, that's not a logical argument, that was a joke from a stand-up routine.
Katy264
You forgot Christians!
Blacks in the US are the only group that I know of that has a whole industry built around ensuring that they stay victims! Leaders of the NAACP aren't exactly hurting for cash, are they? There is a whole money machine alive and well in the US that only thrives if black people feel like victims. It is truly disgusting. Can anyone say democratic party??
------------------------
I really have tried, but I just can't hold it in any longer. Katy264, your posts make it clear you know absolutely NOTHING of Black people or their current situation, and apparently you've conveniently forgotten that the ENTIRE United States once had a vested interest in "ensuring that they stay victims".
I have to say, your posts very often exude a hatefulness that is extremely disturbing each and every time you click "post comment", and I'm truly baffled as to why you're even here. I'm asking you to please tell us, in all seriousness - what about your own life is so horrible that you simply MUST always look down on, or talk down to, someone else? I get the feeling you enjoy being mean. Am I wrong about that?
Like the prison industrial complex. Like right wing politicians who use black folks to scare voters into supporting them. Like the politicians who use use the dog whistle of reverse discrimination to tap into the energy of the Angry White Male vote. Like talking heads like Limbaugh and politicians like Reagan (did) use the myth of the welfare queen as a bogey man to support the gutting of the social safety net. Guess what, ain't ain't just blacks who are needing public assistance or unemployment insurance. Or public education.
And you've been on record as saying that blacks don't value education so public education needs to be abolished. Over four white kids go to public schools for every black child. But don't let that get in the way of recycling a Reagan talking point. I also don't need to reiterate my own experiences going to a very predominantly black middle school. I.e. several of the kids tested about as high as I did and nearly all had better grades. No, that would be INCONVENIENT to acknowledge that wouldn't it?
So you are saying that the slavemasters of the blacks are the ones who say that it is wrong for black folks to go hungry? For black kids to be uneducated? Really?
"Well why don't they find work like real REAL Americans?"
Why don't they bring jobs back from overseas and reopen the factories that the blacks left the farms they were sharecropping in to go work at? Why aren't the unions there to provide them with health care and security and a pension when they are too old to work? They did for the generation that fought in WW2, and yes - blacks benefited from the economic expansion after WW2 and had pensions.
I think she only posts here when she's off her meds.
keepintime, you really could have stopped there...:)
I hope Katy is enjoying her time off...
Melissa Harris-Perry is one smart woman. This was an excellent essay and I feel wiser after watching it. Thank you.
Re sshygrl's post, I agree!
Dislike this opinion piece greatly. Frankly, faith is not required to live with hope, since giving up faith, I have a greater since of personal peace.
I believe you are confused between faith and religious believe. See definition of faith below:
1. confidence or trust in a person or thing.
2. belief that is not based on proof.
If you have given up faith, you have then given up hope because hope is to desire without any expectation of fulfillment (faith).
When she speaks of "faith," she specifically refers to religious belief, if not any specific belief, thus Diane's use of the word is appropriate. MHP herself is trying to conflate these two senses of the word "faith" in order to make an apologist point.
@Justin, I don't buy your comment one bit. Dr. Harris-Perry is a Unitarian Minister, among her plethora of other intellectual pursuits.
Most traditional Christians I know think Unitarians are not only going to hell, we'll be driving the bus. We believe in faith as hope of something bigger than ourselves. To some that is God, to others it is something else; maybe the Giant Spaghetti Monster or gravity, for example. The universe itself proves there is something bigger than each of us.
A friend of mine told her mother she was a lesbian at 18, and it was no big deal. When she told her mother she was converting from Catholic to Unitarian, she was almost disowned.
MHP is one of the least likely people to conflate religious faith with ordinary faith and hope. Her point was not apologist either.
Agree.
ahhhh, ok....i was told by my son's very religious grandparents, and father, that i should try a unitarian church. ha! no f'en wonder!
oh that made my night :)