
Associated Press
Vice President Biden touts the Buffett Rule in Exeter, N.H.
The debate over the Buffett Rule is missing something important. As it stands, the fight is between Democrats who believe millionaires shouldn't pay a lower tax rate than the middle class vs. Republicans who says no one's taxes should go up by any amount at any time for any reason.
That's a legitimate fight, to be sure, but there's more to it: approving the Buffett Rule would mean closing a loophole, and in the larger context of the debate over tax policy, this makes all the difference in the world.
Let's step back for a second. Paul Ryan's House Republican budget plan appears to add an additional $5.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. Ryan insists that's not the case -- once he "clears out all the special-interest loopholes," his numbers will start to add up.
Which loopholes? Well, it turns out that Ryan refuses to say. Maybe they're secret loopholes; maybe they're imaginary loopholes; but either way, he hasn't identified any -- literally, not one -- loophole he's willing to close to help pay for his own agenda. It is, as Paul Krugman put it, the "mystery meat" of the Republican plan.
"Oh, yeah?" my Republicans friends ask, "well why don't Democrats come up with some loopholes to close?"
And therein lies the point: the Buffett Rule closes a loophole. It's a quirk of the tax code that certain millionaires who enjoy private-equity riches pay a lower tax rate than middle-class families, and approving the Buffett Rule would not only mean establishing a degree of fairness, it would also mean scrapping this loophole.
The point is not lost on President Obama, who made this observation on Wednesday:
"I'd just point out that the Buffett Rule is something that will get us moving in the right direction towards fairness, towards economic growth. It will help us close our deficit and it's a lot more specific than anything that the other side has proposed so far." [emphasis added]
In other words, where Paul Ryan is vague and evasive, Obama is being direct and specific. The president is identifying actual loopholes he wants to see closed (Buffett Rule, corporate-jet loophole, tax subsidies for oil companies), which would total tens of billions of dollars in the coming decade. Meanwhile Republican leaders talk about loopholes, but choose not to back this talk up with anything substantive.
One approach represents an honest budget policy. The other, relying on magic asterisks, is a fraud.





A lot of the Republican States are also adopting these principals when doing their budgets. They are not being transparent as to where the money is going. It is all very vague. I think our economy is doing bad because prices keep going up but, our paychecks are not going up. We can survive but, we cannot afford to buy any goods that are not a neccesity. More and more though people are having a hard time even surviving. Our focus should be on those people and not on the rich.
"I'm taking less water out of the bucket, but that's okay, because I'm going to seal up some holes in the bucket."
"Which holes?"
"I refuse to say at this time, but trust me, at some time, in the future, I will address those holes."
"Well there's a big hole right here that we could patch easily."
"You socialist! how dare you patch that hole, that hole leaks water to people who deserve it."
"But it seems like they have enough water already."
"Exactly, they already have too much water, so if we give them water, it will trickle down to the people who need it."
"Why can't we just pour some water on the people who need it?"
"You marxist! you have to let the free hand of the market distribute the water."
"But we would be putting the water into the market, we'd just be prioritizing people who really need it, besides, we dumped a huge amount of water on those people who are higher up a couple of years ago."
"That's different, when you give water to people who don't need it, you're investing, but when you give it to people who need it, you're engaging in socialism!."
"You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means."
Excellent!!! You should forward this to the Congress.
The media/SuperPacs and Congress keep lying about the loopholes. See http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/04/how-washington-forgot-where-the-buffett-rule-came-from.php?ref=fpa for more info on the 'coverup'. This is the whole problem with fixing this country period. These guys think we don't NEED to have a discussion on ANY issue because they will TELL us how it 'is'...
The corporate elite and privileged super-rich won't pay their fair share in taxes, so they must face accountability. Americans are fed up with the special treatment lavished on Wall Street and the One Percent by our elected lawmakers while the hard-working folks of this country are called names, insulted, and forced to take the brunt of "deficit reduction." Wall Street gets government bailouts and record profits while real Americans are laid off and have the government benefits long promised to them ripped away. http://www.sunstateactivist.org
The biggest loophole is the one that allows 50% of Americans to PAY NO FEDERAL INCOME TAX AT ALL!
(now that I have your attention, that is Ryan's complaint, not mine.)
Damn right!!! We need to find a way to make those damn parasites pay income taxes. And it does not matter if that 50% includes children and unemployed and people making less than $100 a week. In order to have a really 'fair' tax system, we should make everyone pay the same amount of taxes ($$$ - not percentage). If they do not have income or sufficient income to pay their fair share, we should establish debtor prisons and use those damn parasites and children for forced labor to those who can afford to pay their 'fair' share. Damn right that this is snark attempting to mock the Day-Troll.
Okay, which one of you is being sarcastic?
Both, but I don't think SadOldVeteran understood what Day was saying.
The more decent paying jobs, the more people making enough to pay taxes. Florida has no state income tax that might inconvenience the wealthy. Instead they nearly doubled the cost of driver's licenses and auto registration and state ids. This harms those who can least afford it.
Republicans don't actually believe that no one should ever have their taxes raised. They are perfectly willing to raise taxes on non millionaires by killing the Mortgage Interest Deduction in order to cover the cost of further tax cuts for the top 1%. They also seem terribly interested in locating people who make so little that they don't qualify for income taxes and making them pay too. Because in their minds, "fairness" apparently means that people who make almost nothing should pay more taxes than General Electric.
I believe that this is a misinterpretation. I believe that the republican position is that the Mortgage Interest Deduction should be eliminated for primary residences and that it should be kept for 'vacation homes' and 2nd and 3rd and 10th homes because those are really investments.
I think that everyone has missed an important point here.
Paul Ryan has opened the door to closing loopholes. He brought it up.
Now, how can he say that we can't raise anyone's taxes, ever?
But then, how can he want to make the bottom 50% pay at least something "in taxes"? He means income taxes, not the sales taxes, (indirectly) property taxes, or soc. sec. taxes that they already pay.
The Grover Norquist pledge also says that cuts in programs can't be shifted to add to other programs, the money from cuts has to go to reduce the deficit. Maybe this is his problem. The loopholes he closes will go to pay off the debt, while the increase in revenue from the loophole Pres. Obama wants to eliminate would be used for programs that he thinks need more money.
So this bill the Dems hope to have a vote on early next week will be renamed "The Buffet Rule To Fix The Romney Loophole And Reduce The Ryan Deficit" bill?
Probably should be named Just another political stunt that we really don't mean, because if we did our corporately owned DINO senators would make sure it fails.
"mystery meat" I remember mystery meat - it was an end-of-the week ingredient of a casserole served in the dorm - the casserole bowl was green so we called it "green pot". Still, you knew it was perfectly good meat - just a left over.
Ryan's unnamed special interest loopholes bring to mind "pink slime" rather than "mystery meat".
States are opening up their taxes for corporations. States are allowing corporations to keep State taxes they collect from their workers. so instead of worker getting options in the company their taxes go toward profits. In NJ 178 million was kept by Goldman, and Verizon, and not paid to the states. Same with the Ryan plan.Keep giving millionaires more tax cuts and talk about closing loopholes. I guarantee that will be ones enjoyed by the middle class. Don't Republicans realize that we have bridges and roads to repair, teachers, fireman, police and essential workers are being laid off. Why?
So the rich can get more!
howa4x
Why?
This is not really the topic to get into it - but you might take some time and research "leveraged buy outs" - LBO's. Prime candidates for LBO's have little debt, many assets, and an OK market share - in other words - a healthy but somewhat boring company - Bain Capital would call this a "troubled" business. Imagine the United States at the time President Bush took office.
If you viewed the country at that time as "troubled business" and desired to "rescue" it using the Leveraged Buy Out process - just what would you do?
I'd title it "The LBO of the USA by the GOP for the RICH"
If I thought about it for a while, I might be able to work a few more short abbreviations into the title.
Adam_Selene
I'm going to be pedantic, but I think it's important: "Paul Ryan's House Republican budget plan appears to add an additional $5.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade."
I know Steve just made an easily-made boo-boo, but "deficit" should be "debt."
Pedantic post concluded.
So $5.4 Trillion added to the debt over 10 years = $540 Billion a year. Currently - and for the 3rd straight year - we've added around $1.9 Trillion each year. Personally I don't like either annual amount, but IF these are true numbers, I would go for the one that is about 75% less per year.
DisgustedWithItAll - his plan fits with of my comment in 10.1 - massively increase a company's debt load, then cut employees and or their benefits, sell off divisions (privatize SS etc.), cut maintenance (roads, bridges) in order to cover payments on the debt.
Adam_Selene
As a parent I get a tax credit to offset raising my kids. Now not all adults within child bearing age get this credit just in case they may consider the possibility of having a child eventually. Further, once my children reach the ripe old age of adulthood(17 yrs) it is assumed that I no longer have large child raising costs and my credit ends.
So, why can't we apply that thinking to Businesses and Corporations, why not give them tax credits for running a business here, that hires here, and provides benefits here. If you are hiring outside the US...no credit for you...if you are not building businesses that employ workers and just investing...no credit for you.
Why can the government invent ingenious ways to oversee what the average worker gets credited and whether it should apply but if you are a large corporation raking in millions then you just get the money on the off chance you will actually employ people and invest in economic growth?
Loopholes don't help anyone but the person using them.
There is no way that the special interests are going to allow Congress to close loopholes, particularly those that benefit business. Those loopholes allow companies to pay far less than the effective rates and in some cases get subsidies from the government. If Congress attempted to move to close the loopholes and cut tax rates, the lobbyists would be all over DC. Even if Congress was able to close loopholes and cut tax rates, the lobbyists would begin the process of trying to carve out exceptions in the tax code to exempt income from tax. What is taxable is always defined in the tax code and by creating exemptions from taxable income, the business gets the same effect as a loophole. In effect, business would still have a significantly lower effective tax rate.
Ryan and the Republicans want to continue to shift the tax burden to the middle class and poor by eliminating domestic programs and hiking the taxes. I cannot foresee the wealthy sitting idly by and watch Congress eliminate the difference in tax rates for earned income and income from investments even if the tax rates were lowered. These different tax rates help subsidize the wealthy because they can shield their incomes from the higher rates and the wealthy are not going to give up the preferential rates on investment income. Ultimately, what will come out of a new tax code is a simplified tax code that is still riddled with different rates and treatment of incomes. The wealthy and business community will give up nothing because the "loopholes" will be buried in the statutes by definitions of income.
Sounds like a band. The could have Thaddeus McCotter on guitar.
Huckabee can play too.
Mike, the timing was irresistible. You posted about "Ryan and the Republicans" as I had Mike and the Mechanics on playing "Silent Running."
It's a sign, I tell you.
I haven't listened to that album in ages. I will have to dig it up and put it on the IPOD with the other 12,000 songs.
Dunno 'bout you, but Pandora is my friend.
Then again, I disconnected from popular music in the 70s and missed a lot of good stuff (and the usual >90% dreck) from there on.
My IPOD has 95% music before 1970 with Springsteen, ELO and a few Beatles and Stones that came out after that date. The music spans from the 1950's to Woodstock. I have a few bootlegs and a lot that I can't fit on the 64 gigs. The music is 224 mp3 bitrate and small artwork 300 x 300. And I still can't get all my music on the IPOD. I have over 1000 cd's with some rare collections Bear Family and MFSL. I have a massive collection of Beatle bootlegs that I haven't even burned. In addition, I have created some high end Beatles and Stones discs that can only be played on DVD players. The music is 24 bit rather than 16 bit cds.
I forgot to add that all of it is lossless discs that I have ripped, not music ripped from mp3 back to disc. I don't do mp3 except on the IPOD. I have software that can check to see of it is lossless.