The nation's largest health insurer will keep parts of health reform in place no matter what the Supreme Court says.
Meet a non-citizen who voted in Florida.
The Benton Harbor golf course is part of a disturbing trend of local governments monetizing federally funded park land.
Commerce Secretary John Bryson cited for felony hit-and-run.
Crowdsourcing some Civil War mysteries.
Hide-and-seek from a toddler's point of view.





Rachel made the comic strip 'Dustin' this am. :-) http://www.arcamax.com/thefunnies/dustin/
Now, we can say we knew her when...
As with most reforms, there are easy parts and hard parts. The easy ones are usually popular and cheap - the hard ones are often essential but also cost more.
I read this statement by UnitedHealthcare as being willing to do just the easy parts.
(Something is better than nothing?)
So UnitedHealthcare will voluntarily:
“These provisions are compatible with our mission and continue our operating practices.” {If this were true, why did it take the ACA to get them to adopt these policies}
Not included:
The latter would be impossible to do unilaterally, said UnitedHealthcare officials, because the company’s risk pool could be quickly skewed toward sick children. But in a statement they said the company is “committed to working with all other participants in the health care system to sustain that coverage.”
"...impossible to do unilaterally" - absolutely correct. "Government" in the purest sense of the word is us doing together what we can't do by ourselves (military, roads, sewer system...)
The ACA provides the mechanism to do this - insurance companies will all take on this additional risk so the risk pools are not skewed. To offset this additional risk - covering more sick people - the ACA provides the mechanism for the companies to cover more relatively well people - the individual mandate (or as the Republicans called it when it was their idea - personal responsibility).
My conclusion - Keep the ACA and fix what needs to be fixed.
Seriously, Rachel should check in on the MIchigan/Emergency Financial Manager situation in Detroit. The City Attorney as filed suit against the state over it's imposed consent agreement (as is her job) and the governor is threatening to withhold $80 million if she does not drop the suit. Since when can a governor say "drop your legal action against me or I'll withhold taxpayer's money?" This is Al Capone governance.
It is reasonable to assume that, prior to installing an emergency manager in a community, the state would have performed audits and analysis and determined that the situation required emergency action. Were these documented and published?
It is also reasonable to assume that the emergency manager would go into the situation with specific issues that need to be corrected and would report on a periodic basis about progress. Because nobody should be given that kind of power without over-sight. Has this been done and are if so are they available?
If the answers to these questions are Yes - then where are they? I'd like to read them.
If the answers are No - then ... that would just be WRONG!!
Just FYI, the voter purge in Florida is still being carried out by a few of the county supervisors. The local ones here in SWFL are still doing it, mostly due to pressure by Rick Scott and the local news agencies, who are heralding their success as the true starters of the purge:
NBC-2 (http://www.nbc-2.com), the local NBC broadcaster for Southwest Florida, is making the claim that it's their "investigative journalism" that started the boulder rolling of Gov. Rick Scott to go all "WE MUST STOP THE FRAUD!" campaign.
They started this whole shebang back in February with their initial two-part ( [Part 1: http://www.nbc-2.com/story/16662854/2012/05/07/nbc2-investigates-voter-fraud][Part 2: http://www.nbc-2.com/story/16666098/2012/02/02/nbc2-investigates-voter-fraud-part-2] ) story about shoddy record keeping by local elections officials.
NBC-2 expanded their efforts to a whole series of tracking their progress...
- Feb 8th, 2012: Collier Co. turns over evidence to FDLE (http://www.nbc-2.com/story/16772858/voter-fraud-investigation-update-law-enforcement-sec-of-state-taking-action)
- Feb 17th, 2012: FDLE launches investigation (http://www.nbc-2.com/story/16961885/nbc2-investigation-sparks-criminal-investigation)
- May 1st, 2012: NBC-2 digs into felon records and compares them to voter rolls, finds problems (http://www.nbc-2.com/story/18167342/2012/05/07/felons-still-on-florida-voter-rolls)
- May 7th, 2012: State gets serious about 'fraud' issue (http://www.nbc-2.com/story/18165667/state-sweep-finds-1251-ineligible-voters)
- May 11th, 2012 State gets even more names tacked onto purge list (http://www.nbc-2.com/story/18315032/nbc2-investigators)
- May 18th, 2012: [NBC-2 finds a lot of background info on the fraudulent voters (http://www.nbc-2.com/story/18554920/voter-backgrounds-revealed-involved-in-probe)
- June 6th, 2012: Gov. Scott tells the fed to go pound sand (http://www.nbc-2.com/video?autoStart=true&topVideoCatNo=default&clipId=7370164#.T9D0JhRv1-Q.reddit)
- June 8th, 2012: Gov. Scott talks with NBC-2 about the purge (http://www.nbc-2.com/story/18740779/2012/06/08/gov-scott-discusses-voter-purge)
May 18, 2012 article
"We've also learned the state first started finding potential non-citizen voters in early 2011, but waited more than a year before contacting supervisors of elections to verity their citizenship."
"Scott says the state's trying to be proactive."
Ummm --- So they waited until the last possible moment to purge the roles and left these citizens to scramble to get their voting rights back?
WOW! There's democracy at work for you!!