
Getty Images
Romney doesn't mind trying to slice the truth very thin.
Paul Krugman, who's been nearly as frustrated by Mitt Romney's habitual dishonesty as I've been, noted this week that political observers should pause to appreciate "this remarkable spectacle." Krugman added, "I really don't think there's been anything like this in American political history: a presidential campaign, with a pretty good chance of winning, that is based entirely on cynical lies about what the sitting president has said."
I agree. Mitt Romney is, at a minimum, unique.
What's especially striking, in addition to the volume and frequency of the falsehoods, is how often the dishonesty is obvious. Jonathan Bernstein has labeled this "lazy mendacity" -- untruths based on "the indifference to any fact-checking," and "the insistence on continuing to use a lie long after it's been definitively debunked."
To better understand the phenomenon, take a look at the 27th installment of my weekly series, chronicling Mitt's mendacity.
1. Romney claimed this week that President Obama was saying success "is the result of government," not "hard-working people," when Obama said, "If you've got a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."
That's as obvious a lie as Romney has told all year. It's not even close to what the president said.
2. Romney told CNBC's Larry Kudlow, in reference to last week's massacre, "There were, of course, very stringent laws which existed in Aurora, Colorado."
Actually, that's the opposite of the truth.
3. On a related note, Romney said "it was illegal" for the Aurora gunman to have his arsenal.
That's not true. The gunman in Aurora purchased his guns and ammunition legally.
4. Romney told donors this week that Ronald Reagan was so focused on the economy after taking office in 1981, he told his aides not to schedule any national security meetings in his first 100 days as president.
That's so ridiculously false it seemed to thoroughly annoy Republican media figures, including Bill Kristol and Marc Thiessen.
5. Romney told CNBC's Larry Kudlow, "I think the president made an error coming into office and deciding that the economy would take care of itself."
I don't know what planet Romney's on, but on this one, Obama came into office and immediately worked on a stimulus bill called the Recovery Act. Romney probably should have heard of it -- he's condemned it many times.
6. In the same interview, Romney said Obama is responsible for a "takeover of the health care industry."
There is no universe in which this makes sense -- "Obamacare" relies on private insurers, not a government takeover.
7. Romney also told Kudlow the economic downturn has "gone on for three and a half years."
In our reality, the Great Recession began in December 2007 (when George W. Bush was president) -- not January 2009 (when Barack Obama became president).
8. Romney said a president should have "at least six months or a year" to get economic policies "in place."
This is fundamentally dishonest, given that Romney refuses to allow Obama to use this standard to defend his own term.
9. He added, "When I say extend the current tax setting, what I'm saying is, don't raise taxes."
Under Romney's proposed tax plan, those struggling most would see their tax burdens go up.
10. Romney went on to say, "I'm not looking for tax breaks for high-income folks."
11. He also said he has a plan that will "show the world that we're on track to having a balanced budget within eight to 10 years."
There's overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Romney says his plan "can't be scored," but independent budget analysts have found his agenda would make the deficit bigger, not smaller, and add trillions to the national debt.
12. Romney described Obama's economic vision this way: "This is an ideology which says hey, we're all the same here, we ought to take from all and give to one another and that achievement, individual initiative and risk-taking and success are not to be rewarded as they have in the past."
This isn't even close to being true (but it is a little nuts).
13. Romney also argued that the president "demonizes" and "denigrates the people who have worked hard."
Romney has never been able to point to a single instance in which Obama has actually done this.
14. In reference to Bain Capital, Romney said, "[O]ver the history of the firm, which I helped start, they made some 350 investments, 80 percent of which grew."
Nice try, but no.
15. In his speech at the Veterans of Foreign Wars National Convention, Romney said the president, in his "dealings with other nations," has given "apologies."
The whole "apology" lie hasn't gone away yet?
16. In the same remarks, Romney said Obama has "diminished" Americans ability to "shape world events," adding, "[T]his president has diminished American leadership."
This is something of a subjective question, but at a minimum, all available evidence suggests American leadership has more international stature and credibility now than before Obama took office.
17. Romney went on to say, "Today, we are just months away from an arbitrary, across-the-board budget reduction that would saddle the military with a trillion dollars in cuts, severely shrink our force structure, and impair our ability to meet and deter threats. Don't bother trying to find a serious military rationale behind any of this, unless that rationale is wishful thinking. Strategy is not driving President Obama's massive defense cuts."
These aren't President Obama's massive defense cuts. Romney's talking about defense cuts proposed by congressional Republicans as part of the congressional Republicans' debt-ceiling crisis.
18. He added that national security leaks are "contemptible," adding, "It betrays our national interest. It compromises our men and women in the field."
Given Romney's take on the Valerie Plame leak scandal, this is literally unbelievable.
19. Romney went on to say, "The operating principle of American foreign policy has been to work with our allies so that we can deter aggression before it breaks out into open conflict. That policy depends on nurturing our alliances and standing up for our common values. Yet the President has moved in the opposite direction. It began with the sudden abandonment of friends in Poland and the Czech Republic."
Officials in Eastern Europe say this isn't true.
20. In the same speech, Romney said, "President Obama had a moment of candor ... just the other day. He said that the actions of the Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez have not had a serious national security impact on us."
The actions of the Hugo Chavez really haven't had a serious national security impact on us. (Hezbollah's interest in the region isn't exactly new.)
21. Romney added, "[T]his is the president who faltered when the Iranian people were looking for support in their struggle against the ayatollahs.... When unarmed women and men in Tehran find the courage to confront their oppressors, at risk of torture and death, they should hear the unequivocal voice of an American president affirming their right to be free."
The Iranian people weren't looking and didn't want U.S. officials to intervene. That's not "faltering"; that's sound judgment -- the protestors didn't want to "hear the voice of an American president" at all.
22. Romney went on to say, "It is in our mutual interest for China to be a partner for a stable and secure world, and we welcome its participation in trade. But the cheating must finally be brought to a stop. President Obama hasn't done it and won't do it."
Obama has already cracked down on China in ways Romney doesn't seem to understand.
23. In an interview with NBC's Brian Williams, Romney said of his one term as governor, "I began a relationship with the speaker of the House and the Senate president that was personal. We respected each other. We often disagreed. But we found common ground from time to time."
That's wildly misleading. In his one term, Romney issued more than 800 vetoes, over 700 of which were overridden, and demonstrated a "relative disinterest in bipartisan collaboration."
24. In the same interview, he asserted "we have not" increased trade with Latin America.
That's not true. Since early 2009, the exports of goods and services to Latin America have increased nearly 50 percent. (Obama also signed trade deals with Panama and Colombia.)
25. A Romney campaign ad this week claimed, "Where did all the Obama stimulus money go? Friends, donors, campaign supporters, special interest groups."
I'm not sure why Romney keeps repeating this one, but it's not true.
26. And in his first diplomatic incident of the week, Romney said Bob Carr, the Australian foreign minister, told him that America is "in decline," but that the situation could be turned around if an appropriate budget deal is reached.
Carr said Romney's version of events is "not correct."
Previous editions of Chronicling Mitt's Mendacity: Vol. I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XI, XII,XIII, XIV, XV, XVI, XVII, XVIII, XIX, XX, XXI, XXII, XXIII, XXIV, XXV, XXVI





Okay, Mitt is a chronic liar. Then again FOX is a lie machine that thrives on fear mongering and rewriting history. So it appears that the right is easier to persuade if lied to and panicked into senselessness.
The Republican/conservative brain is ruled by fear. It doesn't take much to persuade them to hate something, especially if it has a different hue than they're used to looking at.
Might be easier to chronicle when Willard actually tells the truth.
Sick, it'd be an empty blog entry.
Paul and Disgusted hit on something vital. Fear and hostility to what's different is their underlying connection to the religious right. When the world around you is constantly changing and uncertain, and it scares you, the reaction of some is to seize upon simple, seemingly absolute principles that define you as right/righteous, and everything else (including what scares you) as wrong and evil. Righteous wrath against change and newness is the Percocet of both groups.
You people are so out of touch. Obama has never had a job how can he understand the economy. You touchy feeling people are killing the US. You look for anything to get you comunist leader back in office..
Let me guess. You have a Rebel flag don’t you?
Yes, yes, all that. But, you WILL have to agree that this president is , um, b l a c k.
And, in the eyes of Mitt and his supporters, is all you need to know.
But,but, he's Kenyan.
Gawd is this a Spielberg movie?
We have to realize that most people simply can NOT keep up with the insistent march of quantity, quality, and the absolute magnitude of the lies manufactured by the Romney Disinformation Machine. It just isn't possible for people to fathom it's openly, brazenly happening right in front of their eyes. And the press isn't interested as all the little jaded Winston Smiths take to the keyboards to record the new daily history rewrites.
I guess there is a genius to that, sickening and nauseating as it may be.
Steve- This has been my favorite segment since you started it over at Washington Monthly. I even wrote a plea for you to continue it here. But it hit me today how absolutely depressing it is that you are able to write a long feature EACH AND EVERY WEEK on the utter shamefulness that is the Mendacious Mitt-stery Tour. How far our country has fallen.
What's shameful, actually, is how shamelessly he lies and then just lies some more when he's called out.
By the time Willard finishes his trip, Obama WILL have to go on an apology tour.
I have an idea for a new game show called "Mitt's Mendacities." Now for the lightning round: how many of Mitt's mendacities can you spot in thirty (or sixty) seconds? Mitt: "Obama hates America." Announcer: True or False? LOUD BUZZER. Announcer: False!
Rinse and repeat.
And the best part is, you could run ten or twenty of those spots and never run out of big, whopper, head-smacking lies that Mitt's told! Genius!
The whole world needs to see this complete list, it shoud be a daily talking point. Everything about this guy bothers me, but the blatant, outrageous lying is just mindboggling. Winning by lying is a disaster waiting to happen. I don't get why more people are not bothered by this.
So with the Republicans having just about completely rewritten the congressional & pesidential political playbook to include a chronic and intentional calculus of flip-flops and lies by their presidential candidate, what are they going to say when the Democrats begin adopting these same new standards once the tables are turned?
That this is the 27th installment of Mitt's lies just flabbergasts me.
with a pretty good chance of winning,
I love krugman, but he doesn't know what he is talking about. Right now romney's chances are minimal. He has consistently trailed in the polls in NH, OH, VA, and CO. He needs to win all three. He has never lead in a credible poll in PA, WI or MI. He would have to flip one of these states if he doesn't sweep the first group.
As of right now, obama has the clear advantage.
I wouldn't get too confident, there. The Rmoney/Republican Big Mouth Lie Machine has even got started yet. Romney can't even spend his own campaign funds till after the convention. The amount of vile nonsense coming after that will cause decent people to have to shield their eyes and cover their ears. Seriously, we haven't seen anything yet. We aren't going to know what hit us.
Have to agree with Disgusted . The ShMitt slinging machine funded by the Pacs Adelson etc will bury us
Romney can win a critical state with voter suppression. That may be his best chance of becoming President.
Oh yee of wishfull thinking. PA is in play, with 750K-1M potential Obama voters being suppressed. OH and CO already being stolen before our eyes. PLEASE, if Obama isn't leading 61% to 39% on election morning, President Romney will be declared before midnight. And, unfortunately, that 39% is NOT hard to get to. Start with a base of 20% racists, add 10% brain-dead, low-information-voters; and finish up with 9% who are confused by the aforementioned LIES, LIES, and MORE LIES.
It's not looking good for Democracy.
You're assuming, of course, that the Republican attempts at voter suppression in several states will fail. And that those states that rely on Diebold voting machines will somehow overcome the built-in Republican bias. My take is that Obama will need at least a ten-point spread in those states to overcome Republican vote-tampering.
"We" were sure that idiot Bush could never be elected either, and look how that came out. And then the same thing all over again 4 years later. And I understand the same sentiment was widely held that the idiot Ronald Reagan could never win. Who was it who said you can never go wrong by underestimating the American people? We cannot be complacent or make any assumptions.
The City of Aurora does have the most stringent gun laws in the state. That IS true.
More info, or a link, would be appreciated.
"in the state" still makes 'stringent' a relative claim, if Colorado as a whole has looser laws than the rest of the country.
Romney along with Mccain have been beating the drum's of war to supply the opposition with arm's.Now I read that Al-qaida is infiltrating the rank's of that opposition.Would'nt Romney and Mccain love it if the Pres had sent arm's and they ended up in the hand's of Al-qaida.But the Pres. is to smart, he knew this could happen and that's why he hesitated in sending them.Romney or Mccain would have jumped right in and sent arm's.But as I've said before this President has an uncanny ability of being right.He was right about the stimulus he was right about Lybia,he was right about not invading Iraq ,and he's right about how to create job's but he get's no help from the republican congress and and even some cowardly member's of his own party. Now the question is will Romney lie and say he never would have sent arm's?
"... even some cowardly member's of his own party."
Those "some" being THE Dem. leaders in the House and Senate, I believe.
Actually, that would be the Blue Dogs, Democrats who should be Republicans but didn't have the oral skills to make the cut in their state GOP parties.
You can throw one more onto the pile. Last night at his fund raising dinner in London, Mitt said he would return the bust of Churchill from England to the White House. It is still in the White House.
patrick, the Churchill bust is not in the White House. Britain lent the bust to the Bush administration after 9/11, on the condition that it be returned after his tenure. Bush left office, the bust was removed from the Oval Office and replaced with a bust of Lincoln, and the Churchill bust was ultimately returned to its owners. It now sits in the British Embassy.
This entire bizarre falsehood took root when Mike Huckabee was flacking his book, in which he opined that Obama spurned the Churchill bust because he was still resentful that the British detained his grandfather during the Mau Mau uprising. On his own show and others, Huckabee repeatedly dropped hints about how Obama was raised in Kenya and retains "anti-colonialist" views. Gingrich and other RWNJs picked up the meme and for a while it was somehow bad to be anti-colonialist (er, weren't the Founding Fathers essentially ant-colonialist?) Huckabee was forced to retract his lie, but not until he had plenty of chances to use "Obama" and "Mau Mau" in the same sentence.
Anyway, that tired old corpse of a lie has new life these days. Here's an article that lays out this story in mire depth.
http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/stories/2011/huckabeekenya.html
This is a ridiculous claim, and I'm surprised I haven't seen anybody else point out that the bust in question is not Romney's to reclaim. As you point out, it was lent to Dubya by the British, to whom it has been returned. Romney is welcome to say that he'd display *a* bust of Churchill in his Oval Office, but only the British Embassy is able to return *the* bust of Churchill to the White House. After his travels this week, that seems unlikely to occur. ;-)
Thanks again, Steve. Good to see you on the tube last night.
Can't anyone find any thing wrong with Obama.or is everone blind to that.
Blind, either color or ideologically.... he can't do wrong, he really really can't.
Sure. But Obama looks like the Man of Steel next to this putz.
Obama's not perfect... but in the comparison between the two, there is zero contest. The right, like J reb and David, have to make things up and selectively read statements to find something that they can take wrong if they look at it just right and really try, while us on the left, well, Romney just hands it to us on a silver platter.
Where would we be if President Obama had not done the Stimulus?
Where would we be if he did not bail out the auto industry?
Where would we be if Mitch O Connell's only goal was to help get our economy back and not making his only goal to make President Obama a one term President? I missed that section in his oath when he was sworn in that said I swear to put my Party's interest before the interest of our Country.
Where would we be if the Republicans has passed the American Job Act proposed in 2011?
Where would we be if Republicans had passed the portion of the American Jobs Act to get teachers and first responders back to work?
Where would we be if Republicans would pass the Infrastructure bill to put citizens back to work?
Where would we be if Republicans had put as much effort to work with this President to create jobs as they have in trying to Repeal the Affordable Health Care Act 33 times and all their attempts to pass legislation on women's reproductive rights.
Imagine where we would be if the Republicans had not put Party before Country? They could have worked for "we the people" instead of protecting "them the people". The so called Jobs Bills the Republicans keep saying they passed in the house are mostly regarding Regulations.
Like a used car salesman, Romney has the gift of bullsh*t. Unfortunately for him, even his own party looks to be getting out of the buying mood at this point.
Obama prevented the Second Great Depression
And yet has kept this country in the greatest recession since then. He hasn't even bothered submitting a budget to congress in three years and has continually called for raising of the debt ceiling to pay for this mess.
You mean, The Bush Depression.
@Miguel Re: #19.2
I think, to be fair, the Great Recession (some are calling it depression) was caused by policies that go way back - 1990s or even earlier - and everyone contributed. For instance, deregulation of Banks started during Clinton administration.
David, a budget wouldn't have relieved the recession; JOBS would have, but the GOP said no to all of those, for fear it might make Obama look good to be doing something about it, while they spent their time renaming things and reaffirming the national motto. The debt ceiling went up seven times under Bush, EIGHTEEN under Reagan; Obama has done it twice. He's going to have to work hard to catch up to the patron saint of the GOP, since evidently in your mind "continually" is more than 18 times in 8 years, which comes to more than two and a quarter times a year.
Sorry David, but facts and history aren't on your side.
thank you for this service to your country.
I think republicans are starting to come around to the idea that Mitt is not their man. It's hard to admit you've been wrong, so for them to start coming around is kind of nice to see. We really don't know how good of a President, Obama, could be, because congress likes to do anything except work, Ron Paul being the exception, for one.
Romney reminds me of Baghdad Bob.
Where are the journalist? Why are so few looking at this and pointing out what a liar Romney is. Has the news media been bought and sold? This scares me more than Mitt the liar. Thank heavens for the few who have the courage to speak up.
I made a similar comment (#25 here) before seeing yours. Yeah - all those "journalists" who let us think that going to war in Iraq without questioning Bush are doing the same thing with Romney - not challenging untruths. Is something not being taught at J-schools anymore?!
Does anyone know if there's truth to the rumor that one tax break is Mitt's ongoing, all inclusive business trips to the Dominican Republic? Or is that just another urban myth?
Did CNBC's Larry Kudlow ever directly challenge Romney's statements, or just let them pass as if they were true?
Romney's lies are shameless! But,simultaneously, scary! What is up with this guy! Whatever it is; it is not presidential at all! Romney's political behavior is dirty and low down!
It is tough reading this because we have been living through it, but really, just how Rachel and Krugman and others can actually work with this Romney style of campaigning without retching, is beyond me. What a cesspool of lies Willard Romney has created! Maddow, Krugman and the rest have my sincere admiration and deepest sympathy at the same time.