
More of tonight's citations will appear below, but for now if you're looking for the site for finding who's behind the purchase of political ad time, that's here: TV Station Profiles & Public Inspection Files.
__________
Here's tonight's full list:
Paul Ryan: Marathon Time Claim Not True
Romney: Russia Our Number One Geopolitical Foe
First since '52: No talk of war in GOP speech
Romney exaggerates meager comments on Afghanistan
Romney campaign unveils first TV ad for swing-state Wisconsin
Fired Board of Elections Democrats sue Husted
DEFENDANT JON HUSTED'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO ENFORCE AND MOTION FOR STAY (pdf)
Voting Rights Act Questioned By Federal Judge
Legislative committee to meet Tuesday on Iowa secretary of state's emergency voter rules
Florida voters facing a long, long ballot in November
Gov. Rick Scott signs election bill that cuts early-voting days
Brown, Mandel Race Is Most Expensive in Nation
FCC votes to require online disclosure of political ad spending
Revealed: The Dark Money Group Attacking Sen. Sherrod Brown
Political/Issue advertising inquiry/request public file form (pdf)
TV Station Profiles and Public Inspection Files
PPP Ohio Survey Results, September 9, 2012 (pdf)





grrr! TV stations kink isn't working! I'd love to have it for MA.
oops! I mean Link.
I wanted to find the KMOV at Todd Akin.
https://stations.fcc.gov/station-profile/kmov/political-files/browse-%3e2012-%3efederal-%3eus_senate-%3eus_senate-%3etodd_akin
There were some docments, however I could not open or download the PDF file. What it the point to load documents when the documents are unreadable.
Shirley
I tried to get Todd Akin information from KMOV. They had pdf files but I could not open the files or download the files. What is the point of this information if is not viewable.
https://stations.fcc.gov/station-profile/kmov/political-files/browse-%3e2012-%3efederal-%3eus_senate-%3eus_senate-%3etodd_akin
This Week in Hate God continued:
Just as I said, Sr Simone Campbell is a liar and a phony catholic:
Catholic Nun Bears False Witness Against Catholic Bishops at Democratic National Convention (Video)
Posted on September 7, 2012 | Leave a comment
Sister Simone Campbell of NETWORK (A national social justice lobby) and “Nuns on the Bus” fame spoke at the Democratic National Convention on September 5, 2012 in Charlotte, North Carolina. In an effort to deceive Catholic voters, Sister Campbell opened her speech with the lie, that the Catholic Bishops stated the Ryan budget failed a basic moral test.
She falsely said:
“Paul Ryan claims his budget reflects the principles of our shared Catholic faith. But the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops stated that the Ryan budget failed a basic moral test, because it would harm families living in poverty.”
The problem is that the Catholic Bishops (Bishops’ Conference or United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB)) never stated this.
What is the proof that Sister Simone Campbell’s statement is untrue?
The proof is she took a similar statement made by a committee inside the USCCB named the “Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development” and said it was from the Catholic Bishops (USCCB.) More importantly, the Catholic Church purposefully denies committees inside Bishops’ Conferences authority as stated in the Catholic Code of Canon Law’s chapter on Bishops’ Conferences, Canon 447-459. This Canon was clarified and updated in Pope John Paul II’s apostolic letter issued “motu propio” known as Apostolos Suos (On the Theological and Juridical Nature of Bishops’ Conferences.) See Pope John Paul II’s Apostolos Suos paragraph 23:
“…Smaller bodies —the permanent council, a commission or other offices—do not have the authority to carry out acts of authentic magisterium either in their own name or in the name of the Conference, and not even as a task assigned to them by the Conference.”
Sister Campbell (click for biography) made up her own Catholic doctrine and created her own magisterium on this matter. Also, as the Executive Director of NETWORK, her organization has a connection (click) with the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR) who have been found to practice doctrinal dissent by Pope Benedict XVI and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (click.) Sister Campbell’s false witness was being repeated previously by several entities. Click on this story to see where: Catholic Bishops Did Not Condemn the Ryan Budget: See Canon Law and John Paul II Letter (this article shows the Ryan budget to pass the moral test.)
See Sister Campbell’s Democratic National Convention speech in the video below. She makes her false statement in the first minute. You’ll also notice that she says “we agree with our Bishops,” even though there was nothing to agree on in this matter. You need to know that she didn’t agree with the Bishops on defending our Religious liberty from the Obama HHS mandate:
The above video has already been disabled on Sister Campbell’s NETWORK website. Now you can watch the video of her speech at Lay Catholics’ C-Span Video Library account here: CLICK HERE FOR VIDEO of Sister Simone Campbell’s speech at the Democratic National Convention
Additionally, NETWORK published this graphic after her DNC speech which includes the untrue remark below:
As Catholic defenders of the faith, we must all get this story out far and wide. We cannot let this falsehood damage the Catholic Church or our Bishops. We cannot allow it to manipulate our Catholic brothers and sisters into voting against a true Catholic conscience based on a falsehood. It is Sister Simone Campbell who has failed a basic moral test. Pray that she abandons this false witness. If you have the opportunity, let her know of her error. This is a good time to practice the first three Spiritual Works of Mercy with Sr. Campbell. Hopefully, we will be able to put into practice the fifth spiritual work of mercy toward her soon. In the meantime, find comfort in what the truth is about this matter, bear the wrong patiently and pray.
O Holy Spirit, strengthen us to defend all that is holy.
Peter L. Hodges Sr.
Please take you sermons to a Catholic site where I am sure it will be appreciated. You are not God and therefore your judgment of another is simple just you being judgemental.
Stop trying to force your beliefs on others, each person has the right to find their own path to God or not. We are a Country of diversity and that includes Religious diversity. Leave everyone alone to believe what they choose to believe. You and the Republicans have to understand you can not legislate Religion.
@ Lorr
I am certain that you would choose to silence me and any other (republican, conservative or otherwise) who wishes to freely express themselves only because they profess a belief other than yours. You are not talking about "diversity" here, you are talking about a refusal to admit one be allowed to religious expression and or in other cases, the freedom to speech. Only because it is contrary to your strongly held beliefs. I find that type of thinking, hypocrital and in your case here written towards me, disengenuous. Yur arguments against my rights are intellictually dishonest. Because you are not concerned about a freedom to believe what one wants to, rather your concern is to discontinue any activity or speech which would harm the progessive movement forward of your own thought as it regards , God, religion or faith matters. But not exclusive to these. No you would prefer that all those who do not agree with you to shut up and go away. Instead of contering my positions on God etc, you wish to expell my thoughts and expressions from the public forums. They are anathama to you. Instead you want me to keep my little thoughts in a tiny little box or room (maybe a church or church hall) where you won't be bothered by them and you can continue to dispell anything which is contrary to your opinions. God forbid anyone else hear the words and be moved in an opposite direction.
No one is trying to legislate religious beliefs, no more than you and some who believe as you do. Restrain the thought about god, damn the very expression of adoration and or doctrinal adherance. I have seen the exercises of crude and reactionary attacks on others who disagree with you and this blog's audience . Those who address matters and issues in a diverse manner. Let's just take the owner of Chick Fil A. The bigoted, hatefull and vile expressions here were outrageous. But yours was the freedom to express them. If it were up to you neither I or anyone else who disagreed with you should ever type a syllable. Goodness no. Shame on anyone who disagrees with those here.
Let me tell ya', as a lay catholic not only do I have the right to say something, I have the obligation to do so. Any lay catholic is commissioned to do so through the reception of the sacraments of baptism and or confirmation. It's a duty. That is what the "propagation of the faith" both means and entails. More than a "civic duty" to which many feel the obligation to adhere to in the secular rhelm. So when I hear Ms Maddow proprt to tell a story about the catholic faith and in this case Sr Simone Campbell and I know beyond a reasonable doubt that it would be offensive to my obligations towards the church not to counter that, then I have the obligation to respond. If you or anyone else here doesn't like that, so be it. Close your eyes and shut your ears. Ignore me as another of your fold would instruct you to do.
The ONLY reason I ever came in here was to stop the distortions and false claims about Sr Simone Campbell and to destroy the fabricated nuances about what she stands for. Especially that she at all represents the Catholic Church. That is a LIE. This offends me. No matter what your reason, I have every right to do so. This is America. And that is what real democracy is about. You, who claim that I and others exercise a form of fascism because we should dare relate our beliefs, are simply being hypocritcal. For YOU are true fascist when you resist the rights or seek to suppress the rights (let's say as they would at the DNC, "the God Given rights", after all it's YOUR platform) of others like me and which belong to me as an American citizen living in this country.
I first came in here protesting the lies and misrepresentations of the truth about the Catholic Church. That which is presented by first Ms Maddow on her television show and secondly by the blog author who has a "vactionally exercised history" with Barry Lynn's Americans For Freedom Against Religion Org. If someone is going to scandalize the faithful and others or no religious affiliation, no matter what YOU think, I have the obligation to stand against them. And in speaking out here, I am exercising the right, liberty and duty to do so. Just as much as any Occupy messenger or any one affiliated with the recall movement previously held throughout Wisconsin.
You want to restrain me because mine is not the ONLY opinion in regards religion, faith or political matters. You want only YOUR thoughts and beliefs institutionalized and those who agree with you, ONLY you. You don't really care about diveristy of religious belief, no, you want your secularistic god/religious belief ( which in my opinion is a marxist democrat ideology )to be imposed on everyone.
As long as Maddow and the Blog author continue to lie and distort and pretend to tell an objective truth, then I will be here to set the record straight and tell the whole truth. Every time they follow with a "nudge", I'll be here to "push" back!
Thank You
Re: first quote: Right back atchya
Re: second quote: No argument there
As someone who was raised Catholic, in a big-a$$, blue collar Catholic Family, who went to church every stinking day--not kidding--I assure you, dear sir, that neither does the Catholic Church.
That is all,
MG
P.S. Quit voting for your own comments. It's bad form.
I don't want to restrain you - I just do not want to preached at everytime you post. However, it is your right. So I will just skip the post when I see your name. We disagree and you will not change my opinion and I will not change your opinion.
I still maintain that Irish has mental problems (at least as far as how he comes across). Granted this is most likely a failure of the Internet and he's just not understanding how it comes across, but if he really acts this way in person then, like I said last time, he reminds me of my schizophrenic father. He jumps from subject to subject, rails on the same subject again and again to the point that it doesn't make sense, he openly contradicts himself, he spews out words and in particular is ludicrously emotional when he posts in comparison to the issue he's talking about, he's overly sensitive to criticism, etc. The non-sequitur way of his posting is the part that disturbs me the most. Normal people don't jump from subject to subject without there being any correlation. He's making the if you say orange I automatically conclude tiger leap of logic that only exists in the mind of schizophrenics. GRANTED that it's likely just because he's so furious! furious I say! when he's posting at us st00pid liberals that he's just not paying attention, but it comes across like woa dude you need help. He and Shooter seem to have problems with that.
I just finished watching the show, and Rachel's amazement that Romney is getting credit by some Republicans for Bin Laden's capture. I can tell you that most people get their political views from sound bites with no basis in fact. Maybe they get it from friends, or from TV ads, or from local news. But in any case they don't have the knowledge to separate fact from fiction, and are not going to invest the time to learn the difference.
Otherwise, an ad campaign which spreads lies wouldn't work.
Sorry to be the one to tell you all this but there is only one explanation for these poll results. Uninformed IGNORANCE. These are the same people who yell about no government take over of healthcare and hands off medicare. IGNORANT people who watch way too much FOX news and listen to right wing radio. A sad reality in our country.
So NC is a swing state. i go to the site about presidential race funding near Asheville, WLOS, We have ten for Obama and none for Romney listed. Yet i see Romney ads all the time. Why's that? I wnat Obama to win, but wonder if WLOS has correct info up?
https://stations.fcc.gov/station-profile/wlos/political-files/browse-%3E2012-%3Efederal-%3Epresident-%3Emitt_romney
My apologies to the Spinners....
FLIP-FLOP MAN
(to the tune of the Spinners’ Rubberband Man)
Hand me down my etch-a-sketch
Hand me down my chalk
Hurry now and don’t be late
'Cause we ain’t got time to talk
You and me we’re goin’ out
To spout the latest lie
Guaranteed to blow your mind
So wrong you’ll want to die
Hey, y’all prepare yourself
For the Flip-Flop man
You never heard a sound
Like the Flip-Flop man
You’re bound to lose control
When the Flip-Flop starts to jam
Oh, Lord, this dude is without sight
Everything he does
seems to come out RIGHT
Once I went to hear him speak
At a place outside of town
I was so surprised, I was hypnotized
By the lies this cat’s puttin’ down
When I saw this tall fat cat
Stretch a fact or flippin' a view
Hey, I cried so hard ‘cause the man got low
When he tried to get to you
Hey, y’all prepare yourself
For the Flip-Flop man
You never heard a sound
Like the Flip-Flop man
You’re bound to lose control
When the Flip-Flop starts to jam
Got that Flip-Flop
On the run
And when he wraps it up
Let’s hope he’s long gone
(Doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo)
Guaranteed to blow your mind
(Doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo)
Talkin’ to all “you people”, and denyin’
(Doo doo doo doo doo doo doo doo)
Where in the world did he learn that, oh, Lord
(Doo doo doo doo doo)
Lord, help him go away
Hey, y’all prepare yourself
For the Flip-Flop man
You never heard a sound
Like the Flip-Flop man
You’re bound to lose control
When the Flip-Flop starts to jam
Doo doo doo doo doo
Doo doo doo doo doo doo doo
Doo doo doo doo doo
Flip-Flop man, Flip-Flop man
How much of this stuff does he think we can stand
So many lies, gaffes, and shelters from one man, Lord
And then he had nerve to insult my Man
To his knees, he better be headin, y’all
Ah, come on, baby
Hey, y’all prepare yourself
For the Flip-Flop man
You never heard a sound
Like the Flip-Flop man
You’re bound to lose control
When the Flip-Flop starts to jam
Flip-Flop man starts to jam
Movin’ up and down across the land
Got “you people” all in his ways
Everything about him seems out of place
Just a movin’, just a movin’, just a move-move-movin’
Just a Flip-Flop, Flip-Flop man
Just a movin’, just a movin’, just a move-move-movin’
Just a Flip-Flop, Flip-Flop man
Instead of offering her opinion of Paul Ryan, Rachel really should have asked Dan Rather what basis he had for his lofty Paul Ryan expectations.
Ironic to make this mistake in a discussion of the quality of interview/media scrutiny.
I believe Romney is going to get specific at the first debate. The format could leave a lot of room for Romney to get way more specific than normal and trip up the president. I remember an old saying, " if you can't beet em' confuse em' ". I am very concerned about this.
D.S.
I believe the Romney is going to get policy specific at the first debate. He is going to try to trip the president up while being more specific at the first debate which lends its way toward a format that could be troublesome to Obama. I remember a saying," if you can't beet em' confuse em". THIS is the strategy!