
Getty Images
On Capitol Hill yesterday, Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) spent the day after President Obama's second inaugural pushing a new bill: the two hope to eliminate the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act. Hatch said the existing policy runs "counter to our constitutional framework," ignoring the Supreme Court ruling to the contrary.
There was a time that a bill like this would cause some consternation, and lead folks like me to write posts explaining how and why the Hatch/Alexander plan would increase health care costs by scrapping a policy that Republicans came up with in the first place.
But those days are gone, and bills like these no longer generate anger. Instead, these efforts now seem more pathetic than infuriating. They pop up, find no co-sponsors, are widely ignored even by the right, and it feels like the Republican proponents are just going through the motions, hoping to maybe get a fundraising letter or a Fox News appearance out of pointless legislation.
While conservatives may be loath to admit it, "Obamacare" is moving forward, and even many Republican policymakers are grudgingly hopping on the advancing train. USA Today noted developments at the state level.
Two months ago, Republican opposition was virtually uniform across the country. But cracks are appearing and they will widen, predicts Larry Jacobs, director of the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance at the University of Minnesota. "The arc of partisan fever is beginning to recede, and pragmatism is beginning to come to the fore," he says.
Mississippi's Republican Insurance Commissioner sees the Affordable Care Act as a good deal for his state's residents. Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer (R) didn't want to accept Medicaid expansion in her state, but she did it anyway -- it was apparently a case of "math trumping ideology." The Republican governors in New Mexico, North Dakota, and Nevada recently reached the same conclusion on Medicaid, while the Republican governor of Idaho recently endorsed the creation of an Obamacare "exchange."
This is the exact opposite of what the right had hoped for.
For many conservatives, state implementation -- or in this case, the lack thereof -- was the next key step in fighting the Affordable Care Act. It didn't matter how many families the law would help; what mattered was trying to kill Obamacare as part of a larger partisan/ideological battle.
And to be sure, the right's lobbying has had some effect. Many "red" state officials, especially Republican governors who harbor national ambitions, are doing as they're told -- rejecting Medicaid expansion and the creation of exchange marketplaces simply so they can say they're doing their part to block implementation of the law.
But given Republican apoplexy over health care policy, I think the more important breakthrough is just how many Republicans are doing the opposite -- taking a good look at the Affordable Care Act, recognizing its benefits, and being pragmatic about providing affordable care for their constituents.
Indeed, the broader landscape suggests the Republican diehards, who'll keep hating Obamacare just for the sake of hating Obamacare, are spinning their wheels. House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) called the Affordable Care Act "the law of the land"; public support for repeal is evaporating; and when folks like Hatch and Michele Bachmann unveil repeal bills, few even bat an eyelash.
The Affordable Care Act isn't going anywhere.





You mean Jan Brewer has now invited the Death Panels into her state?
Oh no, we need a woman of action! Where's Sarah Palin when we need her to say Death Panels 30 times a day?
What's happening to my emergency room care here in America? Obamacare is screwing with my free medical insurance in our land of the best medical insurance in the world! Why has Jan Brewer sold out?
Is she a mole for Obama now?-Kevo
Kevo, the mole was proven cancerous.
Kevo, I appreciate and recognize your sarcasm. :} This is no way is intended to detract from that, but as an Arizona resident, I do feel it's necessary to point out that Jan Brewer created her own death panels two or three years ago when she tossed patients needing transplants off of the list of those covered by the state's form of Medicaid. Several have died as a result. The legislature also closed Medicaid doors on those childless adults who need the help. The expansion will open up those doors, and in the end save all residents money as we won't have to pay for those whose only recourse is in the emergency room.
Why she chose to expand Medicaid in the state is beyond me, but I'm very happy she did. It's a no-brainer, because it will create many jobs here, and we need all we can get. It's going to be an interesting legislative session this time around. One bill that's been introduced says that the state doesn't have to follow federal laws. We all know how that will turn out, even if passed and signed by Brewer.
As for her refusal to setup a state exchange, many of us approved of that decision. There's no way this state can do that nearly as well as the feds.
Thank you Haddie Nuff - I had forgotten about that rather infamous moment in your state's recent history! Jan Brewer has been a very offensive politico since Janet Napolitano left to join the Obama Administration!
I am truly sorry Arizona has had to suffer through Jan's learning curve that could still arc in a regressive direction, at any moment she forgets how to govern for all Arizona citizens! -Kevo
For those of you keeping score at home, the many stages of republican grief:
1. Whine.
2. It's unconstitutional!
3. THE GAYS!!!
4. More whining. And Commies.
5. Freedom!!!
6. Ok, but we have to screw poor people and women, too.
7. Acceptance, with whining. (You are here)
I say we take our cue from our Vice President . . . when the RWNJs say they oppose Obamacare, say "Big F'ing Deal!"
Like a patient parent, Obama has allowed the GOP to throw their temper tantrums, to whine and stomp their feet at the unfairness of it all and scream the obligatory "I HATE YOU!" before they run to their room and wail into their pillows. Now that they have it out of their system are are too exhausted to resist, it's time for a mature approach to the economy and other adult topics. I used to think the GOP were acting like 2 year olds, but have since decided they are more like a 14 year old girls in the throes of hormone-driven rage and teen angst.
Ok, so my daughter is only 13 so it's perhaps an unfair comparison. But she is waaaay more able to follow logic than these guys. Even while in the throes of a teenage breakdown. I think you're being unfair to teenaged girls.
I honestly don't know what you could compare our current GOP congresspeople to.
I vote for say around kindergarten age- or maybe the terrible 2's/3's depending on the child. Teenagers are more capable of legit logic if you give them a few days- the Republicans needed years. Hence the younger age comparison :) However, I feel like I should just be grateful it happened- which is very much like a kindergartner. "Thank goodness I didn't have to sit and watch her clean her room for 8 hours" becomes "Thank goodness I don't have to hear about how Obamacare is the government's embodiment of Satan for the rest of my life." Just saying... :)
senator hatch (borin' orrin) and that oregon sheriff who announced his opposition to any "unconstitutional" restrictions on guns exemplify what hugo black (supreme court justice) observed forty years ago, that a lot of people are convinced that the u.s. constitution only, "permits what they want permitted and prohibits what they want prohibited".
Very true. I imagine they are the same people who embrace the bible the same way...what I see from a lot of pseudo-religious people is a backward relationship with God, believing that God serves them, rather than they serving God. One would think that God is a waitress at the lunch counter taking orders from "the regular customers." Health care is just another example. I'm sure Christ taught that whatever we do to the least of our brethren, we do to Him. How the pseudo-religious came up with their idea of how to treat Christ is beyond reason.
.
Hatch and Alexander are trying to return to a winning theme for Republicans. They think they can gin up the Obamacare issue in time for the 2014 elections. But by that time, the health care provisions will have taken effect and unless there are significant problems that affect a lot of people on an individual level, a rerun of the issue will be unsuccessful. In fact, if all goes smoothly, the tactic may backfire on Republicans; people may end up liking Obamacare. And that could spell big trouble for Republicans in the next few election cycles.
Frankly, I think Republicans have decided to face Obamacare with the same view they have on rape... If it's inevitable, you might as well lay back and enjoy it...
Of course, having 'enjoyed' it, you're now stuck with the pregnancy, so stick the bastard with all the child support you can get...