Looking back at the tragic and deadly attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi last fall, we know quite a bit about what happened. We also know, thanks to an independent investigation, that "Republican charges of a cover-up" were "pure fiction."
But as Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) argued yesterday, he can't be bothered with facts -- he has a partisan vendetta to pursue.
For those who can't watch clips online, "Meet the Press" host David Gregory pressed the Republican senator on the unsubstantiated charge that the Obama administration has engaged in a "massive cover-up." Gregory asked a simple question: "A cover-up of what?"
McCain, just a few days after explaining how important it is not to be "disagreeable," became unusually belligerent, asking the host whether he cares about the deaths of four Americans.
Gregory tried to get an answer anyway, responding, "You said there is a cover-up. A cover-up of what?" McCain, unable to think of anything substantive, said, "Of the information concerning the deaths of four brave Americans."
Even for McCain, whose capacity has deteriorated sharply in recent years, this was a pathetic display.
Remember, McCain has had several months to think about this. He's sat through classified and unclassified briefings. He's participated in a series of congressional hearings. He's (presumably) read the results of independent investigations, and had his own questions answered, verbally and in writing.
And yet after all of this, McCain is not only ignorant of the basics, he doesn't understand his own conspiracy theory. The senator, after pondering the issue since September, still believes there's an elaborate "cover-up," but doesn't know why he thinks this.
The exchange on "Meet the Press" wasn't awkward; it wasn't bizarre; it was alarming.
This was the point at which it might have dawned on everyone watching, including journalists who still consider the senator an credible on foreign policy and national security, "Good lord, John McCain has no idea what he's talking about."
I hate to be a stickler for such things, but as a rule, when the ranking member on the Senate Armed Services Committee accuses the White House on national television of orchestrating a cover-up as part of a terrorist attack, it's not too much to ask that the senator have some idea what he's talking about.
But in this case, McCain is simply lost in a fog of his own partisan rage. At this point, the man doesn't understand what he doesn't understand, and worse, he just doesn't care. McCain no longer thinks it matters that he can't back up his accusations; he simply wants to keep making them. And if you press him for details he should understand, the increasingly unhinged senator will suggest you're indifferent to the deaths of Americans at terrorists' hands.
Why? Because he's John McCain.
Incidentally, this was McCain's fourth Sunday show appearance of the new year -- that's four appearances in seven weeks -- which suggests he'll have another opportunity to answer similar questions in a national setting very soon.
Leave a Comment:
Bitter old man, this John McCain. Can you blame him? He almost won the White House as a moderate Republican, and then was immediately thrown in the trash once he narrowly lost. The party not only abandoned him, they ostracized his ideology and lurched completely to the right (in their infinite wisdom thinking they lost because their candidate wasn't conservative enough - keep that bubble thinking going). Ever since he lost to Obama he has been trying to flail about and remain a key figure in politics, too bad he hasn't paid attention to the fact that BOTH parties are basically ignoring him at this point.
mcCain is trying to remain relevant. yet he and other repubs are filled with such hatred and envy towards President Obama, that they do not care that their hatred is obvious. repubs are also angry at the american people for giving President Obama another 4 years, this is why they refuse to work with President Obama and do not support the very same things they have supported in the past during recessions to move our economy forward to HELP the american people.
repubs are blindly unembarrassable in their hatred towards President Obama.
Um, moderate in what way? Ever since he lost to Bush Johnnie Rocket has abandoned the pretense of moderation. Immigration is one example as he lurches to the inane right, protecting his flank.
The man has a warring nature and as is the case for many who become zealots, belief in something, becomes the touchstone for reality, however vapid the position taken becomes.
Perhaps moderate as a pretense, but not at all in real time.
That MTP's moderator, who I have refused to watch since the '08 cycle, actually did a follow up, is amazing. He is not now, nor ever will be Russert. RM should helm that show.
I have a hard time with your description of McCain as a moderate when he put Palin on the ticket as his running mate.
What do you expect from a moron who graduated at the bottom of his class at Annapolis, and has had the career he has had since as the result of the accident of birth that gave him the name "McCain"?? This is a guy whose entire life has been composed of "failing upwards."
The only job he ever had in the Navy that he did right was when they assigned him as a pimp to get Big Boys Toys from the Congress.
And BTW, he didn't "lose narrowly."
I am not buying the republican vs. democrat good cop bad cop game anymore. When it comes to passing legislation that supports big money or their agenda they get along 'extremely' well and pass legislation with overwhelming bipartisan support (no arguments there). These are items that are censored in debates and are not exposed to the mass media. Example? The NDAA. Although Benghazi is very significant, the excrement you see here oozing out of McCain is a game. A sort of tantrum. Don't let him fool you. If you need a refresher course on his antics, search 'Keating Economics'. Barack is no saint. He signed the NDAA it was co-sponsored by McCain. these are usurptions and warrant impeachment and as for McCain a recall. Enough is enough. Take out the garbage. It stinks.
I am not buying this republican vs. democrat, moderate, good cop bad cop game anymore. When it comes to passing legislation for big money or special interests, there is overwhelming bipartisan support (zero arguments). Example? The NDAA. Although deemed unconstitutional by a judge and highly debatable, this was censored in the debate and also mostly by the mass media. The excrement you see oozing out of McCain here is a game. A kind of tantrum or empty loathsome distraction. Don’t let this fool you. If you want a refresher course on his integrity search ‘Keating Economics’. How do these people get voted back in??? Obama signed the NDAA, McCain co-sponsored it. It’s an outright betrayal of the American people and impeachable! McCain should be recalled. Enough is enough. It’s time to take out the trash. The stench is intolerable.
I'm sorry, but isn't being lost in a fog of partisan rage a requirement for membership in the modern Republican party? McCain may be in decline, but Darrell Issa and Ted Cruz are pretty young. McCain's good buddy and wingman on the Benghazi front, Lindsey Graham, is up for reelection in 2014 and could claim to be afraid of being primaried, but McCain isn't up till 2016, so he doesn't have that excuse.
I guess we should be happy that the Benghazi "conspiracy" is at least about contemporary matters, as opposed to the endless birther BS and Newt's "Kenyan anti-colonial behavior".
Hmm, 365 elctoral votes for Obama, 175 rom McCain. I hardly call that a narrow loss. I call that an a-- whippin...
LOL I do agree, McCain far from almost won the White House...think he is just holding a grudge against the man who whipped his butt in 2008. He's just a pathetic old man..maybe some dementia, maybe he should consider resigning because he is not of strong mind and take a lesson from His Holiness, Benedict XVI, Pope emeritus and step down.
He's lost in something, but perhaps it's not just a 'partisan rage'. Steve says something very important further up, although I can't be certain he meant it in the way it probably should be taken. What he said was:
It's entirely possible that all of McCain's increasing strangeness and volatility is due to diminished capacity.
Looks like it, doesn't it? He's pretty much a poster child for terminal drop.
"Diminished Capacity"- Naval Hero McCain is following in the footsteps of Strom Thurmond, who was the only senator to reach the age of 100 while still in office. So we can look forward to another 23 years of performance art from Wet Start Johnny.
I agree but I would like to put a finer point on it than that and point out that there are lot's of human "Capacities" that can and do diminish over time...
It's not just about intellectual or cognitive mental acuity, your emotional and social moderation capacities can also degrade...As people get older they can become more and more willing to say things that they wouldn't have publicly and are perhaps more prone to more emotional reactions to things that upset them.
"deminished capacity" would be a kind way to put it.
Is there something in the water in Arizona? Sheriff Arpaio, Jan Brewer, John McCain...
this morning Joe Scarborough was prasing mcCain's performance on "meet the press".
she saves herself a big argument, but i hate it when Mika panders to Joe and agrees with him, as she did this morning.
Hasn't that always been the case with McCain he's like a big baby if I don't get my way I will jump up and down. The guy has been in Washington to long. What gets me you never see a show of hands who votes for these nut cases.
My thoughts exactly - Prior to his last run for office, John McCain was (in my opinion) a very reasonable and thoughtful individual. A Republican I could respect and one for whom I actually considered voting, at some point. He was conservative but thoughtful. Conservative but skeptical. I think we are witnessing the beginning of his (all too public) mental decline, which I think is very sad.
And as a side note: it says a lot that this decline (perhaps dimentia?) has the crazy Republican sect cheering him on, with his diminished mental capacities bringing him UP in their esteem...
though of course that's a possibility, I suspect McCain is suffering from the media is now asking follow-up questions syndrome. This is a syndrome brought on by a new phenomena in most of the GOP's experience. They've always been allowed to say whatever they want, act however they want and nobody calls em out on it.. it's been that way for about 40 years that I'm aware of. Even though the media does still cater to the talking points of the republicans, they do, on occasion, expect the republicans to be able to make the talking points sound logical - that's a strange thing in my life.
I think it's entirely possible that his capacity is diminished. Who knows exactly what was done to him at the hands of the Viet Cong during his 5+ years of captivity. Add torture to the personality which was already noted as volatile before his years at the Hanoi Hilton plus the fact that he is now 76 years old and you wind up with a winning formula for dementia.
He was never thoughtful or skeptical - we only thought so because his entire career of incompetence - from graduating last in his class to all his incompetence as a "Nasal Radiator" - hadn't been put out there in public. The only reason the Navy didn't get rid of him for incompetence by not promoting him past Lieutenant Commander was when he got himself shot down through his incompetence, and got put on the POW Fast Track Promotion List. He came back, the Navy tried putting him in a Captain's job at the Fleet Training Unit in Jacksonville and he screwed that up - despite his ancestors, there was never going to be a third Admiral McCain. He was always the product of b.s. and the accident of birth.
LMGem I guess you missed 'Keating Economics'. Search that.
Johnny Mac's faculties seem compromised. I have to wonder if he is competent to serve another term (or even serve out his current one). Although I'm a little more scared of who Arizona would place in his Senate seat instead, given the chance. Then there's the other question, without McCain, who becomes the party's public face on military and foreign policy? Who else do they have with even a shred of credibility on these issues, even acknowledging that McCain's remaining shred is looking more and more tattered every day? Ted Cruz?
"a fog of his own partisan rage" - remember when "maverick" McCain was a pillar of independent thinking? Yeah, that's a foggy memory for most of us. Cartoon: http://distilledmagazine.com/surges-and-questions/
McCain has long been a party stalwart. Which party? The John McCain party. And if his constituency wants to go after Hagel in a personal grudge, he's got no other option but to make them happy.
I shudder to think what our world would be like had he won in 2008.
Senator Barack Obama (Democrat from Illinois) would have been complaining to the administration about poorly run government.
And, he didn't win, so now he's hanging onto his Hate Pole, dancing away while the rest of us are embarrassed for such a fool's spectacle!
John McCain is bringing all of us down - what a zombie-monger! -Kevo
Scary indeed. I think we are seeing the ravages of old age dementia coupled with his arrogance. How dare anyone ask him for an explanation ! He just makes accusations with his talking points, the attack dog of the rethuglicans. Also, a lot of what he is attacking is still classified information. He knows that, but he is banking that the general public and his base do not. I know because my husband is a retired Air Force officer. All of this Benghazi attack was aimed at getting Robme elected. Most of us recognized it for what it was. Shameful politics.
McCain should follow the example set by the Pope.
What rule with absolute supremacy and speak for God?
What rule with absolute supremacy and speak for God?
repubs are doing that already.
perhaps that was your point.
I think he was referring to stepping down when incapacitated by dementia etc.
i agree,,the pope give the good example,,,mc cain should do the same,,,even since palin debacle,,he lost it,for choosing palin and still to this day,,does not understand it is over for him
A massive cover-up is what Donald Trump has on his head.
funny
so funny trump hair is surely a cover-up
FuturePrez. U R a Genious. Still laughing and can't stop. (A massive cover up is what the Donald has on his head)
Love this quote:
But...we still don't know:
1. Did the President know of the former attacks to US stations in Libya? What did his administration do about it in light of other nations closing their facilities? Anything?
2. Did the President make the decision not to send assitance to those who were killed?
3. Why doesn't the oversight committee of Congress have the testimony of those who survived the attack?
There may be "quite a bit" that we know about Benghazi, but there is still quite a bit that we don't know, or at least those who have an oversight roll don't know yet...
You might also ask, what was the effect on the safety and security forces from all the arbitrary cuts that Congress made on the States Dept. budget? Has Congress released the millions of dollars of the State Dept. budget, that it has been sitting on, that Hillary referred to in her testimony? What happened to the CIA operatives that Darryl Issa accidentally exposed by showing a map of secret safe houses on CNN during his witch hunt?
It's the fact that you guys sincerely believe there's the slightest possibility that the president who gave the orders to escalate in Afghanistan, kill pirates who took Americans captive, kill Bin Laden, and personally reviews every drone strike would have hesitated for a moment to send help if it was possible to do so that makes normal people view you guys as deranged children.
It's the fact that you've fantasized into existence an action movie reaction force, no doubt led by Bruce Willis or Ahnold, sitting locked and loaded and ready to go at a moment's notice and just a ten minute helicopter ride away, that Evil Obama refused to permit to go in, that causes everyone who's not in your feedback loop of stupid to look at you like those muttering homeless guys wearing parkas in August.
Steve, the lack of answers to legitimate questions seems to speak otherwise.
Audrey, I'm always for asking questions and seeking answers. The person who claimed to make the decision (Asst Secretary Lamb) said in her testimony that money or resources was NOT a hindrance to making the decision for more security that was requested. So, if you believe the state department, that question has been answered.
rob if you read the congressional report it tells that there were no support units in the area that could be sent. also the benghazi station was so new it was not included into the budget and they had to scramble to shift the budget around for it. mccain and graham was more interested in what time the president went to bed. will they want a bathroom schedule next?
I've grown tired of McCain's antics. his line of questioning towards Chuck Hagel was downright disturbing.
all of that said, I don't believe the administration has done enough to shut down the hysteria from the "right" over Benghazi. Hillary really didn't do a good job with her answers although some of the questions were ridiculous. the Democrats gushing over Hilary and lobbing her softballs during that hearing was embarrassing.
the Republicans do have a point that the administration hasn't done a good enough job of keeping the American people informed about what happened and why the attackers haven't been brought to justice but people like Graham and McCain are making absolute fools of themselves by accusing the administration of a massive cover-up. Reince Preibus put a tweet out the day of the attack accusing Obama of sympathizing with the terrorists and that fool got re-elected. it's hard to take any Republicans seriously even when they do have a good point.
blinwilly, so when our facility had several attacks...what did the administration do in response? Who made the decision NOT to send in help? At one hour into the attack no one knew how long it would last, at two hours in, at three hours in..? Certainly you can look back and say, "hey, no one was close enough but someone evaluated what to do in real time. Who made the decision?
These are not difficult questions to answer.
Oh those troll questions....just keep rollin. Sorta like sh*t rolling down hill.
Perhaps some of your questions are answered here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2012/11/06/whos-to-blame-for-benghazi-a-laymans-guide/
where was McCain when other ebbassies were attacked and American's killed. Or other stations were Americans were killed? Where was McCain on 9/11 hearing when both President Bush and VP Cheany REFUSED to testify before the 9/11 hearings. Where was McCain when C Rice told the hearing she ignored the cables and warnings that there was attack with comerical air lines going to happen. Where was McCain when we were attacked Marine barracks, Cole others? where was McCain when Pres Bush went to war with a lie. How about having a hearing on that why we really went to war? 4,000 + American killed
Also, where was McCain when Reagan decided not to investigate the death of our ambassador to Pakistan, for purely political reasons? A death that was ruled as an accident, but probably wasn't, and has since spawned independent investigations in Pakistan, and accusations of US cover-up and/or even involvement?
I love the responses. Instead of saying, "yes, these are legitimate questions that should be answered," the response are:
1. Troll! (Dismiss)
2. Remember 10 years ago when the Republicans...or 20 years ago when Republicans...
3. And a link that concludes we really don't know enough about what President Obama knew or did, unless something else is reveled we know he was one of the people who oversaw those how made the decisions.
I have some questions about Benghazi that don't seem to be getting asked, and I'm hoping that someone can answer them.
This was an unusual outpost, and it's hard to see what they were doing there. The only answer that made any sense to me was the rumor that the CIA was buying up heavy weapons from arms dealers to get them out of the area and into the hands of Syrian rebels. Now the Syrian rebels are claiming they didn't get any. It might have made sense to acquire the weapons just to keep them away from the northern Mali fighters, but if that's the case, why hide it? I'm at a loss to explain what this apparent CIA operation was trying to accomplish. Anyone have any answers to that?
Chuck, just shut up and they will tell you what they want you to know! SNARK
robtroll: dismissed.
when the prez has worked as hard as he has for the every day working person, and you are from the gop, you have two choices; you can try to find some dirt on him, or, you can try to invent some! if the ambassador had any idea that trouble was coming he could of done one simple thing. he could have left! it was his call and no one elses!obviously they caught everyone with their pants down. the ambassador sounds like he was a very good man. i'm sure he will be missed by his family and friends. but we have lost thousands of men and women in that part of the world. i don't see the senator or any of his buddies in the gop making a big deal about any of the other people who have died serving their country. many of them under rather dubious circumstances! do you get my drift, senator!
No one in Washington is working for the "every day working person." Is this quote from Pelosi the type of working you are referrring to?
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/house/283341-pelosi-congressional-pay-cut-undermines-dignity-of-the-job-#ixzz2LGDVr46S
Ron, if no one in Washington is working for the "everyday working person," then what are your issues really? It didn't just get that way, so are your questions and objections more convenient for who is in the office of the President? Or, is it because you are generally concerned? I think if you really were as concerned as you would lead us to believe, you would be ranting about 5,000+ American soldiers dead due to being dragged into a war (Iraq) based on fabricating information that was opposite of what the intelligence community knew to fact, Iraq had no WMD's.
Your objection, as well as people like you, seems to not be about what's going on with the Presidency, but more along the lines of who the President is. Points of fact are only too obvious. With a significant government structure around the President, I would think it hard for one man to cover something up. Maybe the cover up is overlooking facts because fictional points better serve the narrative. I can guess what that narrative is, but maybe another time. Nevertheless, culpability in the Benghazi matter would lie with the State Department as it always has in the past. When did that change? Is it now the President's sole responsibility? Yeah, no one in Washington is working on behalf of ordinary citizens, but I know what republicanism has produced for Americans. NOTHING! Or, you must be rich!!!!
Raz,
robtroll's hate for this President makes him(and other trolls like him) blind to any truth other than what they want to see.
Raziel, we may disagree on the priorities or the manner at times, but I have no illusions that BOTH parties and their respective leaders have led us down the road we are on. The current deficit and debt to me is the number one national issue...and both parties continue to kick the can down the road.
Robdon
You r a chicken hawk , and a deficit chicken hawk , who was cheer leading and defending bush and the gop back in the 2000's , and to this day , your BOTH SIDES ARE TO BLAME memo is a farce , you are 100% GOP flunky
You blame dems 100% of the time , while defending the gop 100% of the time , you can rest assured the same happen during iraq
from
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/02/08/16902416-the-confused-column-boehners-office-likes-so-much?threadId=3662598&commentId=74076911#c74076911
Robdon is blaming obama for THE SEQUESTER in this link , and completely excusing boehner and the GOP , because robdon is a BOTH SIDES ARE TO BLAME independent guy , RIGHT?????
MY REBUTTAL POST FROM CBS NEWS TO ROBDON
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-20086598/boehner-i-got-98-percent-of-what-i-wanted/
With a brutal partisan fight over the debt ceiling drawing to an apparent close, Boehner said he understands why so many Americans are angry with what's happening in Washington.
( "so the debt ceiling was obamas idea now?" Patango )
The following is a transcript of that interview:
Boehner: It really boiled down to two issues. President was insisting on more taxes. President never got serious about the kind of spending cuts that were necessary in order to get America back on a sound fiscal footing.
Boehner: We'll see what it ( the super committee ) does. But I'm confident their focus will be on reducing expenditures coming out of Washington.
Boehner: I do. When you look at this final agreement that we came to with the white House, I got 98 percent of what I wanted. I'm pretty happy.
Patango, there is a difference in blaming and establishing origin. The Republicans voted for the sequester, no doubt. My post was solely on where the idea of the sequester in this situation originated and I was making the case that it came from the White House.
Boehner was referring to what the deal brought, not specifically the sequester. No one was thinking it would happen. Here is how the White House details the deal and you can see it is mostly around spending cuts.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheet-victory-bipartisan-compromise-economy-american-people
But, you make your point. I understand. I never said the Republicans were blameless, I only said the sequester idea came from the administration.
Sorry rob, , the sequester was a direct result of THE DEBT CEILING FIASCO , you and your party trying to pretend it was not , is a complete joke , as the MADDOW BLOG STAFF have made perfectly clear more than once now
and please do not think you can just rewrite history with your party , obama's main agenda was triing to pass a JOBS JOBS JOBS PLAN at that time , not cut spending and tank the economy , the way your fiction comes about , obama's agenda was to gut gov spending , which is what your gop have been trying to do for 30 years , your warped reality only works on fox nation
And your "warped reality" plays well here. The Maddow staff is a very talented group without question. And they do due deligence on their reporting, but occassionally they don't have the facts on their side. On this issue, they said it was a Republican idea once and then continued to link back to them saying it was a Republican idea.
In the long run, the point is not extremely relevant...only in the sense that it be correct.
Robtroll's post translated:
"I am a blanks style troll trying to appear like I am making a point."
You're welcome.
I''m waiting for McCaine to sit on Meet the Press, click some ball bearings and say:
"Ahh, but the strawberries that's... that's where I had them. They laughed at me and made jokes but I proved beyond the shadow of a doubt and with... geometric logic..."
The only thing wrong with your comment is that a lot of people are not going to recognize your reference: The Caine Mutiny, Humphrey Bogart on the witness stand being grilled by Jose Ferrer. You can watch it on Turner Classic Movies on Feb. 23, 2013 at 12 a.m. EST. That is a little late for those of you in the East, but it is a Saturday night. It is a good movie.
I kid you not!
For years I have wondered why we see John McCain on television nearly every Sunday morning. I think I have the answer. McCain's repeated appearances are really part of a PSA campaign to remind all of us of the need to visit our elderly relatives in extended care facilities.
Why do these Sunday talk shows continue to give this old fossil a stage to spew his poisonous hate?
Given the number of appearances by the two GOP senators, maybe they should combine all of the Sunday shows into one and rename it, "The McCain and Graham Hour."
He's lost it, he should go away quietly, fade into the background of the more reasonable representatives. These men of little faith. His cup is overflowing with money and houses and fancy suits and their collection of cars and their hot tub having their martinis handed to them. Ba Bye!
John McCain, Lindsey Graham (see above): What drugs are in the Republican Koolaid these days? They rave like lunatics.
Here's what's in the Koolaid in no particular order: hatred of Obama, jealousy, political money, being "primaried", racism, ignorance, playing to the base.
I watched this exchange yesterday morning in shock that it was happening.
Wishing that David Greggory had left a huge moment of silence hang in the air before leaning forward and asking, "Senator, are you OK? Do you need a nap?"
Old Man Yelling At Clouds....time to retire McCain.
"The exchange on "Meet the Press" wasn't awkward; it wasn't bizarre; it was alarming."
Alarming is a mild description/euphemism of what Republicans have been for at least 20 years. Better ones are dangerous, nutty, and kooky. It's time to stick the knife in this dying worldview of failed conservatism and stop coddling these asswholes by continuously meeting 1/2 way to their insanity. They never move; Democrats just keep inching rightward to satisfy their Prime Objective of being the "adult in the room."
I kept expecting him to shout "COUNTRY FIRST!". Why is he on the Sunday shows so often anyway? It's as if the media hope to bring back the McCain they so loved in 2000.
They're hoping for more doughnuts with sprinkles.
I thought it a perfect opportunity missed when McCain offered to send in a list of his burning questions that have not been answered. They could have been compared to the ANSWERS already given him on those questions.
I really think he would never accept any answer other then a conspiracy theory answer to any of his questions myself. The man is only looking to find the smoking gun, even though the victim was found dead from a drug overdose. Any Facts or information or evidence, that points to a drug overdose is rejected, and instead the question keeps returning ... " Yes, but Where is THE GUN ? " I see it all clear now .. it is a cover up to hide the fact that a GUN is the TRUE cause of death ..
That is just a hypothetical example please .. do not think it is real or anything other then a made up story to show a point, and that being, There is NO Smoking GUN here McCain ...
I feel that The poor folks Died due to CUTS to our security and Protection Funds that THEY so deserve overseas. They are also located in one of the most hostile areas to Americans, so they become a very big Target for Terrorists, who want to show that no American is safe .. especially on their Soil.
I hope you don't think of this article as news because it is NOTHING BUT pure opinion.
Judi: Only mouth breathers disagree on McCain...
Thank you for your opinion.
Judi: "Please remove head from ass and engage brain before commenting."
rwnj trolls haven't mastered that yet, and probably never will.
There is one question that should be a standard to ask of McCain and the others of his ilk:
Did you attend the high security private briefing on Benghazi? if not, why not?
Soo, now maybe, McAinus will refuse to go on Meet the Press anymore?
Could it be that he knows we have militarized space? Drones in space with hellfires?
It would be nice to have a satellite that, in the case of North Korea's launching a missile with a nuclear warhead, could destroy it from space while still on the pad..?..
Sounds like a program the Bush's could've done and now idiot McAinus is wanting to spill the beans..?.
Conspiracy theories, weeeeeee, not just a ride at the amusement park.
McCain has been bitter for years. Now he's bitter and dangerously incoherent. Time for his retirement.
it is pathetic to hear him ramble and not answer a simple question. his anger seems to be getting out of control...
Vendettas make for messy politics.
yeah, its called stupidity, and racest, John needs to retire or better yet get voted out of office along with other people, he is clearly a racest person and needs a anal exam , doubt they would find much of anything , once an ass always an ass. To bad John, u were once considered a good polotician, now the fields are waiting for you and your friends