
Supporters of New York's Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement (SAFE) Act rally in Harlem, March 21, 2013.

Supporters of New York's Secure Ammunition and Firearms Enforcement (SAFE) Act rally in Harlem, March 21, 2013.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead. (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul) |
Rachel,
Please give it a rest. The Bush bashing from you and MSNBC was understandable pre-2008, but I've noticed a tendency for retrospective bashing even though the Democrats have been back in power for five years. Surely, you could focus on the mistakes of the Obama Administration, i.e. Fast and Furious or Benghazi. I am a two-time Iraq War veteran and I believe we did many improvements and accomplished a lot of good during out time there. I personally met children whose parents were killed by Saddam. A bad dictator now gone. Much good accomplished. Start focusing on the current Presidential administration and their own Hubris.....I never see your investigative reporting when it comes to the Left.
WOW - U=R Truly Psychotic and also sociopathic ! You are Truly an Extremely Disturbed individual !
UM - YEAH - kdj - from No-Ware - is a RE-REG ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ RE-REG !^^^^^^^^^ RE-REG !
Ah, you are right Eddie, he's now in the business of "repeating" himself, and for a moment there I thought he was a REAL person, not just a troll.....
That's an odd comment for a post titled, "Not letting up". LOL
What you call "Bush Bashing", other people call a proper interpretation of historical facts. You know, the kind of mistakes that we should learn not to repeat by shining a strong light on them.
When the Right stops trying to rewrite & white-wash history (like saying we invaded Iraq to "liberate" the Iraqis), we'll stop going back in time to report what was actually said.
KDJ from Stuttgart -- you are, of course, free to stop reading, free to stop watching, free to stop whining, and free to go somewhere else at any time. The exit is over that way ------>
Thus adding to polarization. Which reminds me did you see the study demonstrating that MSNBC is mostly opinion and little fact. Moreso than Fox even.
http://news.slashdot.org/story/13/03/23/067246/pew-research-finds-opinion-dominates-msnbc-more-than-fox-news?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
AMERICANS AGAINST AMERICAN GUN VIOLENCE
Those touched by gun violence, and those who will no longer tolerate bloodshed for the sake of gun industry profit, continues to grow exponentially. Distractions will no longer work.
Reminds you, eh? LOL. Typical misrepresentation, Pooter. It said nothing about "little fact". That was all you.
It also said that FOX has more shows directed toward "news" over opinion, but what wasn't analyzed is how often that news (sic) is itself skewed towards a predisposed opinion, factually inaccurate, or just flat out made up BS.
Again, that was just you creating your own reality. Typical troll.
Did you meet any children of Iraqis killed by Bush? Of course you did. You helped kill them too. You're nothing but a patriotic war criminal.
Decent Americans are ashamed of what we did in Iraq.
Thanks Rachel......Thomas Young has it right when he wrote his "LAST LETTER" to bush and cheney......see "BODY of WAR".
Bush and his crew are war criminals.....my son spent 15 months in Iraq. He has PTSD and brain damage From rpgs going off near him. War based on lies..
Is that performance theater, or a skinhead rant? So hard to tell.
If it's satire, I think you need to be somewhat less subtle in the sarcasm. If it's not, then please take your own advice and refrain from breeding.
Either way, fascinating comment.
So, skinhead rant it is, then. Wow.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtqy4DTHGqg
- B.S. - War - Pigs ------ This video is from 1970 - Does this Not resonate in the year 2013 ?
HOOYAH, protesters, keep it up!!! Congress won't do what's right unless "We the People" make them VERY AWARE that there is a "cost" for serving the interests of others (like NRA, corporations) instead of the interests of the people who voted for them!!
Ditto, onceanunmentionable!
Sooner or later the public WILL prevail.
I have not yet decided whether that is sarcasm, or not.
We do need to keep their feet to the fire, since elected politicians are more interested in keeping their jobs than doing their jobs!
You are kidding, right?
Why don't I just:
Actually, I would rather think for myself and know WHY I do what I do!!!
I'll vote fer anyone who promises to keep my check a comin'
Same old saw...more guns for less violence. I do actually wonder how this makes sense to anyone.
You guys sound like spoiled children "No No you can't take our guns away!"
Citing an amendment that could not fore-see the assault weapons of today. Going so far as to rail against sensible gun measures like background checks and limits on high capacity clips.
I really do believe there is something in these people that get excited by violence.
Some parts of the SAFE Act are positive. However, not everyone is behind all parts. Read the NYS Sheriffs'Association response to the SAFE Act. Also, the Saratoga Sheriffs' Association PBA has a detailed letter outlining their objections to it. As a start...
In NYS, homicides due to long rifles (the category under which Assault Firearms fall) accounted for .007% of all homicides. So that means 0-.007% were due to assault firearms. Leaving 99.993% of homicides not a result of long rifles.
Great use of resources NYS... feel good legislation passed in the dead of night after legislatures had 20 minutes to read it...
Not to mention that lets think of the logic of a ban of over 7 rounds. There are no 7 round clips. There are 10 round clips. So the law abiding citizens will put 7 rounds in their 10 round clip. The individuals who are intent on breaking the law or illegally possessing that firearm in the first place probably will not be real concerned about illegally loading 10 rounds into their 10 round clip.
We need to look more at our mental health supports in addition to supports in our schools...
lisafp: That volunteer firefighter from the Saratoga area that was shot in the back with the AR15 that the psychotic criminal got with a straw purchase does not trivalize the SAFE Act because he is dead. He also does not quote statistics. But hey, you live on, so it's cool...right...
Ever heard of amendments? This is no longer an all or nothing proposal, with the gun industry dictating all.
AMERICANS AGAINST AMERICAN GUN VIOLENCE
Those touched by gun violence, and those who will no longer tolerate bloodshed for the sake of gun industry profit, continues to grow exponentially. Distractions will no longer work.
Slaughtered souls do not rest easy in the minds of those they've left behind.
@Lewbowsky
It is an over generalization when one makes the leap that death is trivialized if we do not take immediate steps to ban the cause of that death.
It is certainly not trivial when an individual is killed in a car accident or murdered by weapons other than firearms. We don't ban cars, but we should look at ways to reduce traffic accidents and fatalities. We don't ban every object used as a murder weapon, but we should look at ways to reduce violent death in America.
As I indicated previously, some parts of the SAFE Act are positive... but we also need to be looking more at our mental health supports in addition to supports in our schools...
and... it is because I live on as do people that I love, that I would like the measures that we take to do more than just provide us with a false sense of security.
lisafp: Nice argument you make for firearm ownership. But in the context of civilians owning military assault rifles that have no hunting utility, it's lacking, notably.
I could help but notice during Thursday's show, regarding the latest CO shooting, you showed footage of a small plane towing a banner that read:
"Hick: Don't take our guns away!"
...referring to Gov Hickenlooper signing a bill to make it more difficult for criminals to buy guns.
Someone... a LOT of someones... paid good money for a banner to beg the governor not to do something he isn't doing: "taking guns away from the people who already legally own them". It seems to perfectly sum up the current debate over guns. Democrats want to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and block the SALE of weapons of war to the general public, and the wild-eyed Right hears "Confiscation".
Really slacker you righties never explain just how having a gun protects you, you just yell and scream you need your gun for protection. We already settled that you having a gun doesn't stop the government from taking your rights away, you already gave up those rights when you said ok Mr Bush take away our rights if it will keep me safe from boogie men you scared me with. We also settled your nonsense that the military will join your cause on taking over the government. So again how does having a gun protect you. All having a gun does is cause you to take risks you wouldn't have taken if you had no gun, in fact a gun is only good if you surprise the bad guy you are so scared of and get your gun out before he shoots, stabs or clubs you. So reality is a gun can't protect you, why cops not only have guns they even take it a step farther and wear armor vests, they still get shoot dead. So again protection, the gun fails.
Only works if you see the "bad guy". Now tell me what does a "bad guy" look like. Ted Bundy looked like the boy next door and women were attracted to him, John Gacey was a clown in fact 99% of the bad guys look normal. So tell me just how you can pick the "bad guy" from everyone else. And you are full of crap because you don't understand humans, here is a clue humans take greater risks when they feel safe.
@Mugsys
Weapons of war are already out of the hands of the general public.
Automatic and semi-automatic differ.
Also, the issue becomes, how do we determine what falls under the "assault weapons category" as various firearms are one attachment away from being on the list or off the list. It ends up being pretty arbitrary and more and more reaching. So what do you do... keep expanding the list...
Lets try to address the true causes of violent death in America...
It takes the remarkable courage born of ignorance to post what you wrote.
Since Newtown 2883 dead from guns That enough for you.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/crime/2012/12/gun_death_tally_every_american_gun_death_since_newtown_sandy_hook_shooting.html
What part of if it stops just one , maybe even your relative , don't you get .
You would do nothing
How many dead from auto accidents since Newtown? There's no provision for cars in the Bill of Rights, so we should force them off the road.
Oh gee wiz Hoops I hadn't thought of that . Why do we even bother with laws at all. Those useless padded dashboards , seat-belts , air bags . People should be free to die gruesome deaths in twisted metal with no safety features at all. Or be free to be gunned down for the crime of going to school or a movie.
lisafp: People on these boards know weapons, and we know law. You are the 195th troll on these comment boards who has attempted to muddy the assault weapon definition issue, so you are hardly breaking new ground. Go to Breitbart, you can be popular there...
Welp, it doesn't get more intellectually lazy than that.
Whatever your argument is, comments like this don't help it, that's for sure.
AMERICANS AGAINST AMERICAN GUN VIOLENCE
Those touched by gun violence, and those who will no longer tolerate bloodshed for the sake of gun industry profit, continues to grow exponentially. Distractions will no longer work.
@lisafp I've heard this comment from 2nd adm protectors before, BUT I have yet to hear what the true causes of violent death in America are. Of all the shootings since Newton what is the cause of these shootings that we are not seeing?
@lastrth
I am talking about effectiveness. Banning assault weapons may give you a false sense of security but it's avoiding the heavy lifting...
Ok then spell out the heavy lifting we are avoiding.
This from a guy who believes a gun protects him from the unknown. Really talk about a real form of false security beliefs, I have a gun so therefor I'm safe because I can protect myself, now for the big question who is going to protect us from you wannabe John Wayne types.
@lastroth
As I indicated before. There are parts of the SAFE Act that are positive and I agree with the position taken by the NYS Sheriffs' Association.
In terms of the heavy lifting...
School reform. We are pouring vast amounts into failing schools. Increased federal dollars does not equal high quality education.
Mental Health reform. The system is not generally user friendly. People in the position to have a positive influence on a person with mental health issues confront a system that does not always make it easy to seek long term solutions/effective supports.
Addressing environmental Influences. Substance abuse, gang activity, family violence, community violence, little to no supervision of youth, lack of positive role models/activities.
Big tasks...
lisafp1@ in regards to the heavy lifting I agree with you on mental health issues. But for educational reforms the level of education attained by the more recent mass shooters was high. If you are talking about the prevalence of urban or street crime we have tried and tried to bring quality of education up to suburban standards. Which leads into your environmental influences which could take a generation or to affect change. So while we work on these two we should accept the 30 or so deaths a day as normal?
@lastroth
I think that the recent mass shooters definitely had serious mental health issues... pointing once again to the need to look at this system.
Educational system change can occur quicker... this is a key factor...we need to look at the barriers that prevent that from occurring. The change in New Orleans schools post Katrina is something to look at...
Other environmental influences need to be looked at further... how are we going to provide positive role models and activities, engage youth...
Certainly we should not accept any death... and I cannot repeat enough that there are parts of the SAFE Act that I support... but the daily loss of life that you speak about will not be measurably altered by an Assault Weapons ban...
Or the world according to Hollywood western movies in the mind of someone that never grew up enough to understand that movies were entertainment not reality. Next he will be insisting that the Flintstones was a documentary and not a cartoon. Heres a clue slacker if the shooter stops to reload there is a better chance of stopping him before he can reload. Really slacker the government already limits the amount of ammo you can hunt with to give game a fair chance of getting away. Oh and slacker if you had it your way the country would look like the middle east with Toyota trucks running the streets with armed nit wits shooting everything up.
So what most people that do shootings are not gun experts so straw man argument. Right because google will make you a gun expert in no time. Again we get the normal clap trap from dopey or is it hopey really clowns are confusing.The idiots are the ones who believe that a gun protects them yet they can never give an example of how having a gun does that, other then stupid NRA stories about the guy who saved his family. Oh and anyone who tries to say that clip size doesn't matter knows even less about weapons then someone who never fired a gun, how do we know this, rather simple really, a 30 round clip can fire 30/31 times and a 15 shot clip can be fired 15/16 times before running out, 15 times if you don't have a round in the chamber. If you found yourself on the other side of a gun you would leave a puddle under your feet as well how do we know this, simple you need a prop to make you feel safe. That is all a gun is a prop to make frightened people feel brave, the problem is you are now just armed cowards.
The only one wishing is you. It is all you have wishes and projections.
Ms Maddow,
You left out the part of the Democratic led Senate approving the Iraq War Resolution.
Remember these beauties?
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
What did they know or were they just playing politics with soldier's lives?
Good post Bob. Expect to be insulted.
Bob: You lose. Democrats were and forever will be called out. The difference is that they accept they were wrong, as opposed to you and the warmongers that started the utter disaster. Oh... I forgot to mention... you lose... and there is nothing below a history revisionist...
AMERICANS AGAINST AMERICAN GUN VIOLENCE
Those touched by gun violence, and those who will no longer tolerate bloodshed for the sake of gun industry profit, continues to grow exponentially. Distractions will no longer work.
Bob M
Doncha just love it when they don't read the byline.
I really told off Rachel Maddow (not)
My teatard friend ...there is a little notation at the top ...now see if you can follow ..it says
By Will Femia
Big reveal...that is who posted the article
You may be surprised but Congress does not have the info the WH has. GWB sold congress a pack of lies.
Bob! You are so defensive!! Could it be that deep down, you know HUBRIS was right? All that blah, blah, blah about the Democrats. Well, they was lied to too, just like the rest of us! Hell, even I supported that war at the time because I believed those liars!!! But it didn't take me long to figure out the truth - taking you a little longer, huh?
oncearepublican,
I supported the war too because I believed what the administration was saying. Over time it became clear there were no WMD's and all the administrations talk was not truthful. I had the thought "what kind of people are these that are sending our troops into harms war and surely many will be killed, based on lies." I lost all respect for them.
A good documentory about the Iraq War is "Why WE Fight" the 2005 version
I'm with you Tom!!!
How about reporting the 12,000 who protested AGAINST the SAFE Act? Because it doesn't fit into the NBC anti-gun narrative. In fact, I know of no major news outlet that bothered to cover it.
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2013/03/foghorn/thousands-rally-in-albany-to-protest-safe-act/
Also noticeable absent form the news is the fact that almost every single county in NY State has rejected the SAFE Act.
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2013/03/13/new-york-counties-work-to-repeal-state-gun-control-laws/
Alpha: Nice activism there, and a great and cheerfull website you linked to. Way to call out NBC as "anti-gun", because we all know reading a blog on Saturday morning is a game changer, prime propaganda time slot. Thank goodness for your brave and fearless stance to protect your home firepower, because the rumor is that a scrawny one hundred and fifteen pound weakling can easily kick your butt. Stay armed my friend...
Too funny - apparently you like living in the extreme media bias bubble. Have a nice day.
AMERICANS AGAINST AMERICAN GUN VIOLENCE
Those touched by gun violence, and those who will no longer tolerate bloodshed for the sake of gun industry profit, continues to grow exponentially. Distractions will no longer work.
What about those touched by gun violence that don't blame inanimate objects? How are they being heard? If you ask the gun manufacturers, they will tell you that President Obama was named "salesman of the year" Liberals kneejerk reactions about guns have sold more guns and ammo in the last year than anyone. Keep up the good fight Locknpost, you are improving the bottom line for those evil, rotten stinking, rich gun manufacturers with every breath you take.
I gotta go call my stock broker now.
And Conservative kneejerk reactions about guns does more to prove the point of gun control than if they could just act like socially responsible people. Well, there's that and all the people who die from gun violence every day.
Ironic, isn't it?
Cue the music for the "Why don't we ban cars?" argument. I'll let my 9 year old slap down that discussion. LOL
Yes Inspector. But your consumer base is dwindling. The sliver of paranoid Rambo-wanna-be's who stockpile can not sustain that level of profit. Consumers are becoming more savvy and responsible. Post mass slaughter reactive marketing will no longer work.
What will you do? What will you do when you can no longer depend on corner market or on-line private sales to domestic violence offenders? When you can no longer depend on arms transfers to the cartel reps waiting just outside gun shows? When you can no longer depend on sales from unaccounted dealer inventories? When the US will no longer unwittingly accommodate international unrest for the arms industry international markets?
What WILL you do? Be careful where you step...
I think that the "we don't ban cars" argument is relevant.
We don't ban cars (as the instrument of death) because we address the causal factors that contribute to death by car... such as excessive speed, substance abuse, distraction such as use of cell phones, etc. in addition to installing safety features that further address issues.
Except that cars aren't designed to kill. That's not their purpose. And that right there is what makes all these silly straw arguments fall apart.
Not that it stops gun nuts from having their debate moment epiphany. God bless 'em.
And last year in Utah more people died from suicide by gun than died in car accidents. I can see the sign now "Welcome to Utah, Suicide Capital of the World". Makes you wonder what those Mormons are so depressed about.
@Rochester
So your plan for effectively addressing violent death in America is...
Education. Less guns. Stronger gun crime laws.
Ahh, Rochester... we are closer than you think. Education... yes! NYS already had some pretty serious gun laws on the books prior to the SAFE act. The process of procuring a pistol is pretty rigorous... the safety training program is very good. But one must be interested in obtaining weapons legally in order to benefit from it. That leads to stronger gun crime laws... again, we are in agreement. Less guns... we can agree on less illegal guns out there. and as I have said previously, I do agree with certain parts of the SAFE Act. Incidentally, I am not a member of the NRA and I don't agree with how far they go with objecting to certain reforms.
And then... back to the causal factors of violence...
Education is the answer to most problems, as long as we're willing to invest without immediate results, and wait for a generation before real social change. Think smoking, and seat belts. (Both of which I used to do and not do respectively with a righteous passion. Thank god for growing up and growing old without growing bitter.)
BTW, NYC Mayor Bloomberg will be on MTP tomorrow. Followed immediately by the multi-millionaire shill for the domestic weapons industry... who will be sure to tell us again in his best Concern Troll voice, that the answer to gun violence is more guns (sic). In any event, I'm expecting absolutely nothing productive from the interviews, but mostly because David Gregory is an incompetent woos.
Speaking on behalf of everyone who watches Meet the Press... boy, do I miss Tim Russert.
We agree again Rochester. MTP hasn't been the same since Tim Russert.
In terms of gun safety education, at least in NYS, a hunter/gun safety course is a requirement before one can secure a hunting license and a firearms safety course is required before one can apply for a pistol permit. Those are immediate. Good model to follow.
In terms of our educational system at large, change can happen as fast as we are motivated for it to occur...
People who point to last month's ammo shortage at Walmart are the same people who point to a late March snowfall and sneer that Global Warming is a myth.
Seriously. Simple people for simple solutions.
Last months shortage at Walmart continues this month too. And will continue until liberals stop trying to pass unconstitutional (be it percieived or otherwise) legislation. Right now there people that never owned a firearm before buying at record rates because of all the crap stirred up by liberals in there quest to "feel" like they are doing something worthwhile.
BTW Global warming is not a myth. The myth is that it is caused by capitalism. Climates continually change on this planet regardless of what the evil capitalists do. Regardless of what socialists do.
Look, it's snowing!!! Based on this, snow shovel sales will only improve all the way through summer. LOL @market nonsense.
In full disclosure, I don't shop at Walmart if I can help it, and for a whole bunch of reasons, not just because of the chance encounter with people like you.
WTF. Seriously... I don't know what that's supposed to mean.
The public wants guns because there are guns. They feel a need to be equal to a person that has one so they want one too.
I say if you wanna make the playing field equal, get rid of the guns. You'll still be able to defend yourself with a punch, kick, and other forms of physical actions...plus you know the attacker doesn't have a gun because there aren't any to have.
I've said it plenty of times. Political fighting causes nothing to be done. You can't defeat the logic of "no killing machine" is better than "a lot of killing machines"
Unless there is a reason to have a gun other than to shoot it...
and how do you propose to get rid of the millions of guns that there are?
just asking...
Lock
Do you really think gun industry should be baiting our inner city youth?
The gun industry isn't doing anything to inner city youth. Inner city parents are doing far more to damage to inner city youth than gun manufacturers. Liberals are the problem there too. By not preaching that hard work and a good education will remove them from poverty and a life of crime. It's not hard to figure out that time spent helping your children succeed in education will be rewarded tenfold. Most inner city parents don't even know what their kids are studying or even if their kids made it to school each day and they really don't care. Children with a GPA over 3.6 in highschool can get a free ride to college due to scholarships and grants, but parents refuse to take responsibility for getting their children that far. Money has nothing to do at all with raising a productive child.
I took locknpost's comment to be about the gun manufacturers disregard of their product to be used wisely. The product should be used by someone that can be proved competent to use it.
The alcohol industry does this often in their commercials. Drink wisely and use a designated driver.
I have never seen the gun manufacturers promote keeping guns out of the wrong hands.
But in their own minds, they all think they're competent. Just like everyone on the road is an awesome & excellent driver... in their own minds. (And please for the love of god, that is not a guns = cars analogy, it's a analogy of arrogance.)
You know, as much as legal gun owners are part of the problem because they encourage an industry that produces lethal weapons, I really don't put the blame on them directly. This Inspector dude, wild-eyed and so often wrong as he is, isn't the primary problem.
It's the lack of accountability for the sale of guns and the ability to track a gun's history of ownership. That, coupled with a gross lack of law enforcement.
Still, less guns, smaller mags and a first-line of defense with universal background checks... that's a good start towards a safer community.
Rochester12,
I wasn't trying to make a guns, cars analogy. I was trying to compare industries. The gun manufacturers and alcohol manufacturers.
I'm just trying to put a focus on the gun manufacturers. I believe that is where the problem starts.
I know, man. It was me who made the analogy, but in a completely different context than the typical nonsense.
No worries.
Well crazy people believe they are sane and everyone else are insane. And our GOP paid trolls prove it in everyone of their posts.
Whomit.....where have you been?
Whomit.....where have you been?
I'll bet he hasn't been looking for a job!!!!
At the root of the debate is the nature of "arms." The pro-gun people insist that the "right to bear arms" means the right to own and keep guns. The gun people assume that Americans have a natural and even a god given right to own any gun they may want. The problem with this argument is that guns are human inventions and as such they should be under the control of human institutions such as human laws.
Complicating the issue is the fact that arms of all kinds keep getting more lethal and sophistocated. The framers of the Constitution did not have modern rapid fire guns in mind. Our Constitution is based on Natural law and on the concept that laws should be based on the will of the governed. Because guns are human inventions, there is no natural or inherent right to one, i.e. it is a right is and should be under the control of human laws.